BUGANDA NEBIZIBU BYAYO YERINA OKUBYEMALIRA:

Political Drama, and tension was shown at the prejudiced Uganda Human Rights Commission headquarters, as Bobi Wine withdrew his music concert petition:

 

By World Media

 

Robert Kyagulanyi talking to his lawyers Benjamin Katana and George Musisi

 

Tensions flared at the Uganda Human Rights Commission offices today Monday as Robert Kyagulanyi Ssentamu squared off with the comission's chairperson Mariam Wangadya.

Thereafter, Kyagulanyi withdrew his petition challenging the police for blocking his musical concerts. Kyagulanyi aka Bobi Wine, accompanied by his lawyers; Benjamin Katana and George Musisi, appeared before Wangadya where he accused the commission of violating his right to a fair hearing and acting with partiality and a lack of independence.

The petition stemmed from police actions led by then Kampala Metropolitan police commander Frank Mwesigwa, now assistant inspector general of police (AIGP) in charge of operations, who cancelled the concerts in November 2018 allegedly to prevent Kyagulanyi from inciting violence. Mwesigwa also accused Kyagulanyi of failure to differentiate between Bobi Wine, the musician and Kyagulanyi the politician and legislator.

"We have noticed that Bobi Wine has been turning into Hon. Kyagulanyi to make political statements at music shows, that is not what we agreed upon,” Mwesigwa said.

The concerts came shortly after Kyagulanyi took his parliamentary oath and amidst heated debates over constitutional amendments regarding the presidential age limit. As Kyagulanyi read his statement, Wangadya interrupted, accusing him of attacking the commission.

"Excuse me, if that is the personal statement you are making, it is an attack on the commission. You are free to withdraw your complaint. We shall not allow you to undermine, emancipate, or disrespect this commission," Wangadya stated. 

She further insisted that Kyagulanyi's accusations of the commission violating human rights were unacceptable and called for security when he attempted to continue.

“You are represented you can speak through your lawyers. I will not allow you to accuse this commission of violating human rights.  You will not speak. Where is the security…?”

In response, Kyagulanyi criticized Wangadya for mocking victims of human rights abuses and declared his intention to withdraw his complaint due to the commission's perceived lack of impartiality and independence.

"I hereby withdraw my complaint from this commission because it lacks impartiality and independence. This is supposed to be the Human Rights Commission helping people," Kyagulanyi stated.   

 

He condemned the five-year delay in addressing his complaint, during which security agencies allegedly blocked his concerts, confiscated equipment, and denied people their livelihoods due to his political affiliation. Kyagulanyi questioned the commission's ability to protect constitutional rights when it seemed complicit in human rights violations, including arbitrary arrests, extrajudicial killings, torture, and enforced disappearances. 

"Madam chairperson, what kind of commission are you presiding over?" Kyagulanyi asked.

He highlighted the ongoing plight of his supporters, many of whom have faced severe abuses without any intervention from the commission. He also criticized Wangadya for dismissing the concerns of families of missing persons by calling their loved ones "ghosts."

"Madam chairperson, you have shamelessly told the mothers, spouses, and children of our missing persons that their missing loved ones were ghosts!” he said.

Given these grievances, Kyagulanyi stated that the commission's actions had severely undermined their confidence in its ability to deliver justice. He labelled the hearing a mockery and withdrew his case, expressing concerns for his safety and citing Wangadya's previous remarks about commission members carrying guns to meetings.

"Having said this, I beg to leave because am not even sure of our safety here, seeing that you, recently said that some members of this commission possess and come to meetings with guns!" 

 

As Kyagulanyi left, Wangadya called for security to arrest him but ultimately ruled the petition dismissed due to his withdrawal. This is not the first time Kyagulanyi has withdrawn a petition. In 2021, he withdrew his presidential election petition from the Supreme court after being denied additional time to file evidence against President Yoweri Museveni's victory by chief justice Owiny-Dollo's panel.

Nb

This sort of political treatment has been the same all along since Dr Besigye started the opposition efforts against the NRM governance.

It is unfortunate that Bobi Wine would expect a different treatment. NRM wants the Opposition in Uganda to do the same as they did to go in the bush and turn the countryside into a killing field.

No sensible person these days would go on and do such atrocities and get away with it. The best for the Ganda tribespeople is to boycott the next rigged national election and stay put at home. The next day they can go back to their work which they know best!

 

 

Kitalo nyo okutawanya nabafu amasiro negokyebwa?

 

AT THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT AT THE HAGUE:

 

The court of the international crimes sitting in one of its sessions at the Hague, in the Netherlands The ICC's main office is in The Hague in The Netherlands. It has smaller offices in New York CityKampalaKinshasaBuniaAbéché and Bangui.

 

 

Willem-Alexander, the king of the Netherlands,

 

 

By World Media

 

12th November, 2019

 

Willem-Alexander, the king of the Netherlands, lives and works in The Hague. His home is called the Noordeinde Palace and it is not far away from the Binnenhof. All foreign embassies and government ministries of the country are in the city, as well as the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (The Supreme Court) and many lobbying organisations.

 

The International Criminal Court (ICC) was created on 1 July 2002. It investigates and punishes people for genocidecrimes against humanity, and war crimes. It is sometimes called the ICC or the ICCt.

 

IN THE MATTER CONCERNING A PETITION TO THE PROSECUTOR FOR THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT BY THE PEOPLE OF UGANDA AGAINST GENERAL YOWERI KAGUTA MUSEVENI AND OTHERS:

PETITION [Brought under Articles 5, 13 (c), 15 and 53 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court]

The undersigned PETITIONERS, being aggrieved citezens of the Republic Uganda of sound mind, hereby state as follows;

WHEREAS; the Republic of Uganda is a signatory to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, and indeed enacted a Municipal legislation to domesticate the same vide;…... AND WHEREAS the following International legal framework provide for the safeguard and protection of the fundamental and other human rights of all people and the Republic of Uganda subscribes thereto;

a) Universal Declaration of Human Rights;

The Instrument recognizes that ‘the inherent dignity of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world’.

It further declares that human rights are universal – to be enjoyed by all people, no matter who they are or where they live and the inter-alia include civil and political rights; the right to life, liberty, free speech, conscience, assembly and privacy. they also include economic, social and cultural rights, like the right to social security, health and education.

b) International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

Article 2(1) of the ICESCR refers to the obligation of every State Party to take steps, individually and through international assistance and cooperation, especially economic and technical, to the maximum of its available resources, with a

view to achieving progressively the full realization of the rights recognized in the Covenant by all appropriate means.

c) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

The covenant obligates state parties to respect the civil and political rights of individuals, including the right to life, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, electoral rights and rights to due process and a fair trial.

d) Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment

The prohibition against torture and other forms of ill-treatment is well established as one of the absolute rights which must be respected without any restriction or derogation. This applies even in times of war or threat of war, internal political instability or public emergency, and there are no exceptional circumstances whatsoever under which torture can be justified, including any threat of terrorist acts or violent crime, or religious or traditional justification.

Article 2 of the Convention provides that a State Party has an obligation to take effective measures to prevent acts of torture in any territory under its jurisdiction, including legislative, administrative, judicial or other measures. Further, Article 2(2) states that “no exceptional circumstances whatsoever” may be invoked in justification of torture.

e) International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance

It is proclaimed in Art 1 of the Convention that no one shall be subjected to enforced disappearance. No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or any other public

emergency, may be invoked as a justification for enforced disappearance.

NOTING that under Article 5 of the Rome Statute the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court is confined to the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole, in respect to the following crimes: a) The crime of genocide; b) Crimes against humanity; c) War crimes; d) The crime of aggression.

AWARE that Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC defines the offence of "crime against humanity" to mean any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack: a. Murder; b. Extermination; c. Enslavement; d. Deportation or forcible transfer of population; e. Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law; f. Torture; g. Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity; h. Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under international law, in connection with any act referred to in this paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court; i. Enforced disappearance of persons;

j. Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health. k. Etcetera

RECOGNISING that the Rome Statute vests both investigative and prosecution powers and mandate in the office of The Prosecutor;

General Yoweri Kaguta Museveni assumed office as President of the Republic of Uganda in January 1986 after a five-year guerilla war waged by the National Resistance Army (NRA) ostensibly to restore democratic governance and Rule of Law in the country and has over the years institutionalised a Gun Rule, abrogated the Constitution, subdued the sovereignity of the people and all State Institutions and continuously retained state power through manipulation of the country’s electoral processes.

NOTING FURTHER that during the most recent Presidential Election of 2016, General Yoweri Kaguta Museveni carried out an outright coup det tat by subverting the Will of the people, detaining Dr. Warren Kizza Besigye, a candidate who had been returned by the people of Uganda as the Validly elected president with over 51% of the votes cast, and subsequently arraigning him on tramped up charges of treason, which up to-date have never been disposed of.

AND

WHEREAS the Petitioners vehemently contend that General Yoweri Kaguta Museveni and a number of high ranking security and public officers, (hereinafter referred to as “his Accomplices”), have committed heinous crimes and gross human rights violations categorized as crimes against humanity to the People of Uganda jointly and severally, for which he is liable to be subpoenaed, prosecuted, tried, convicted and punished by the International Criminal Court;

NOW THEREOFRE the PETITIONERS would like to present and state their case as hereunder;

1. Suppression, torture and extra-judicial killing of Ugandans

As a means of holding onto the illegitimately and illegally assumed power, General Museveni and his accomplices have continuously unleashed violence and terror against the citizens of Uganda to keep them muzzled and subdued. Additionally, Gen. Museveni’s regime has, at the alter of consolidation of a personal rule, committed gross human rights violations and atrocities, including but not limited to torture, suppression, repression, incarcerations and elimination or killing of people opposed, or perceived to be opposed, to the sitting regime.

This has been systematically done countrywide and state orchestrated massacres have been carried out in various parts of the country and the most recent one being the infamous Kaseese massacre that took place in the aftermath of the 2016 General elections, when security forces under the command of General Museveni and his Accomplices raided the palace of King Charles Wesley Mumbere, a cultural leader of the Bakonzo people, in Kasese District and massacred hundreds of people in the most savage manner one can imagine of. To date, no report and/or accountability has ever been given by the regime or any other local or Inernational organization or agency.

Similar massacres have been carried with impunity in Acholi Sub Region, Teso, Lango, West Nile, Luwero Triangle etc and none of the masterminds and perpetrators of the same have been brought to book.

2. Invasion of Parliament and desecration or abrogation of the National Constitution

On 27th October, 2017, during the debate of a Constitutional (Amendment) Bill which aimed at the removal of all constitutional

safe guards against General Museveni’s life Presidency plan, one of General Museveni’s militia groups – Special Forces Command (SFC), members of the Uganda Defence Forces and other security operatives invaded the chambers Parliament of Uganda, brutally harangued, beat up and dragged out several Members of Parliament, transported them in police vans and confined them in ungazetted places. Resultantly, a constitutional provision which had rendered Gen. Museveni ineligible in the forthcoming presidential elections, on account of advanced aged, was violently deleted. This was done in a blatant disregard of Art. 3 of our National Constitution which makes treasonable for any person to abrogate or amend the constitution using violent means.

The Speaker of Parliament, Hon. Rebecca Kadaga is on record writing to General Museveni thus;

“… I am seeking an explanation as to the identity, mission and purpose of the unsolicited forces. I am also seeking an explanation about why they assaulted the MPs.”

Todate,Gen. Museveni has flagrantly refused to respond to the said letter. 3. Use of the state security apparatus and a plethora of Militia Groups to persecute, dehumanize and humiliate political opponents, members of civil society organisations and the citizenry.

Gen. Museveni has over the years personalized the entire security apparatus which has systemically and systematically morphed into a terror machine. The institution of the Uganda People’s Defense Forces, the Police force and other state security agencies are currently used as the most lethal political tools to persecute Gen. Museveni”s political opponents, civil society and the citizenry and to also clamp down on the lawful and legitimate activities and programs of the Country’s political dissent and civic action. Opposition political parties, civil society organisations and ordinary Ugandans have been barred from holding assemblies and/or rallies

for purposes of disseminating and/or advancing their party platforms, programs and legitimate development agenda and any attempt to organize the same is met with brutal force and violence.

Additionally, the regime has established a number of illegal paramilitary groups, hit squads and militia to wit; Special Forces Command, Commandos, Crime preventers, Kiboko squad, Boda Boda 2010, Wembly, Local Defense Unit, Flying Squad etc. These terror outfits have wrecked havoc in Kampala and other parts of the country and have immensely terrorized the Citizens and curtailed their participation in the governance of the Country.

4. Enforced disappearances and curtailment of Civil Liberies.

Uganda is currently engulfed in horrendous fear and tension as many political leaders, clerics and ordinary citizens disappear or get killed in cold blood under very mysterious circumstances. Kidnaps, abductions, illegal arrests and enforced disappearances are a commonplace occurrence today. Many Ugandans are violently and mysteriously whisked away by members of the aforesaid terror machine and security agencies and held incommunicado in secret detention facilities commonly known as “safe houses”, tortured and some eliminated incognito for the sole purpose of entrenching Gen. Museveni’s rule. A number of such dungeons and torture chambers like the notorious Nalufenya special detention facility, situate across River Nile in the Eastern part of the country, have been established various parts of the country and a score of Ugandans have been tortured, dehumanized, maimed and killed from such facilities and may are still languishing there, with little or no hope of securing a remedy or regaining their liberties and freedom.

Prayer for intervention Thanks to the pervasive impunity reigning supreme in the country, the individual perpetrators of these heinous crimes cannot be brought to justice. The independence and efficacy of both the legislative and judicial arms of the state and government have been systemically whittled and eroded by the Gen. Museveni’s “Iron fist Rule”.

The domestic criminal Justice system has been terribly debilitated and emasculated that it cannot reasonably atone for and/or address these systemic and endemic transgressions and violations. The intervention of the ICC is not only desirable but inevitable if only we are to stave off a catastrophe of grave magnitude that awaits the Pearl of Africa.

WHEREFORE YOUR PETITIONERS pray for the following;

a) That the egregious violations of the fundamental and other rights of the Petitioners and other Ugandans by Mr. Yoweri Museveni and his Accomplices tantamount to crimes against humanity within the meaning of Article 7 of the Rome Statute and that the same reasonably warrant investigations, Indictment and trial by the ICC.

b) That the Prosecutor of the ICC be pleased to initiate prosecution of General Museveni and his Accomplices before the ICC and further cause for investigation to be conducted in regard to his illegal and gross human rights violations meted out on the People of Uganda.

We have compiled cogent and overwhelming evidence to support indictment on the aforesaid crimes against humanity, which includes damning reports of different local and international human rights organisations and humanitarian agencies, individual accounts and testimonies of victims of state-inspired violence and torture, dossiers by whitsle blowers and good Samaritans within the security agencies as well as graphic, visual and audio recordings.

DATED at KAMPALA this…………day of……………………………2019.

Name National ID.No. Signature

Name National ID. No. Signature

 

 

The International Criminal Court's main office in the city of The Hague, Netherlands.

 

 

Pictorial: upgraded Entebbe airport arrival and departure terminal

 

Written by Nicholas Bamulanzeki

 

 

Ahead of the recently concluded Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) and Group of 77 (G77) + China South Summits the Uganda Civil Aviation Authority (UCAA) upgraded the arrival and departure terminal. Nicholas Bamulanzeki captured the upgraded terminal on camera.

 

Related Stories

Nb

It is alright for tropical African airports to copy all the replica of international airports. It is unfortunate that the case for sustaining the earth's environment is still a pipe dream! Entebbe airport has had several bird air strikes and one believes that such beautiful architectural pictures do not tell the whole modern dilemma of upgrading tropical airports. One stands with the airline captain of a Boeing 707-320C who was so lucky to take off and hit a flock of birds with only one of the four engines. He had to dump thousands of litres of jet fuel into the surrounding beautiful vegetation of the countryside. The Ganda owners of these lands have a right to complain. Millions of aeroplanes right now flying everyday are the great polluters of the earth's environment. Uganda as land locked is bent on seeing this Entebbe lake peninsula suffocate and become a semi-desert as elsewhere in the Kingdom state of Buganda.

 

 

 

 

The Members of Parliament of the political party of the National Unity Platform have refused to attend the Uganda Parliament until their long time complaints over human rights grievious have been addressed:

 

Written by Baker Batte

 

Mr Mathias Mpuuga the Leader of Opposition in the Parliament of Uganda

 

MATHIAS MPUUGA, the Leader of Opposition in parliament, has said National Unity Platform (NUP) MPs will not return to parliament until they get satisfactory answers from the government on human rights violations issues they raised recently.

Over a month ago, the opposition in parliament raised six issues; seeking answers to the 18 NUP members who have been missing for over two years, a stop to the targeting and victimization of Muslims, a stop to the detention without trial of political dissenters, a stop to the violation of human rights of fishing communities, a shrinking civil space, mistreatment of politicians and media and the trial of civilians in military courts.

Last week, Deputy Speaker Thomas Tayebwa adjourned the House for two weeks as he tries to mediate the impasse between the opposition and the government side. In an interview with Baker Batte Lule , Mpuuga said they are not going to break until such a time when they believe there is sufficient commitment from government to handle the issues raised.

It’s a month now since the stand-off between you and the leadership of parliament started; what’s the current status?

There is no stand-off between the opposition and the leadership of parliament. Leadership of parliament means the speaker, deputy speaker, leader of opposition and the government chief whip. So, there is no stand-off. What you would call a stand-off is between us and the issues we raised to the executive; not to the speaker.

The speakers are balanced presiding officers of the house. When the members of the house raise questions, the speaker amplifies that question and demand the executive to answer.

As long as that question is legitimate and has space in law and in the rules, then the speaker has no choice to demand the executive to make a response. In some cases when the matter has been around for some time, the demand of the speaker to the executive is to make a response faster to the comfort of those asking the questions.

But that stand-off is also spilling over to the presiding officers because it looks like they can’t also do their job...

The presiding officers don’t generate business. The business of that house is generated by the executive and the rules allow the opposition too to table business. The rules are clear that while presiding over the house, the speaker gives priority to the business of government.

Of course, the opposition too brings business to the house and our business now are the issues we raised and the presiding officers asked
the executive to respond to those issues.

Most of these issues you are raising now have been around and you have tried to address them without success in the past; how different is this time going to be that you expect the answers you want?

Whether there is a difference between the present and the past, it doesn’t arise. What is consistent is that the issues we are raising are legitimate from the past and the present.

Therefore, we are consistent and persistent about them. Therefore, we don’t demand different answers from those we demanded last year. Because they are very pertinent and legitimate; whether it is going to take a generation of time for a response to be provided, we want that response. Probably the only difference is that we are not going to back down until there is a response that is acceptable.

What is an acceptable response for you?

We shall judge it from the manner it is presented. It must, of course, include a commitment to justice, to accountability, to truthfulness; those are the parameters. Prime minister Robinah Nabbanja and Gen David Muhoozi, the state minister for Internal Affairs, have said they have provided answers they need to provide.

What do you make of that kind of response?

The problem is that power and knowledge are different things. When you have the power and choose to say what you say, it doesn’t equal to knowledge and when you say things that are not intelligible, we reject them and demand for serious answers and that’s how we construed the response of the prime minister. Her response wasn’t intelligible.

It looks like that’s how you hold the prime minister...

Our thinking is that in government there are other actors and they should be able to sit and see through the kind of response expected of a serious people.

Looking at how you respond to her in the House, one gets a feeling that you don’t take her serious. So, why do you think that she will give you serious answers?

You can’t judge me on whether I take her serious or not but it’s her business to speak seriously. So, when she speaks in jest over serious business, I reject her response but I again ask her to respond. In court, when a witness tries to dodge the questions or fools around, you insist that they answer the questions.

What is transpiring in your corner as we speak now?

I’m in control of my space and my duty is to keep the team together and to keep on making these demands. What happens on the other side is their business. They have a duty to offer leadership and to supply answers when asked. We are not asking these questions for ourselves.

We are asking these questions on behalf of the 18 missing persons, their families and individuals in detention without trial for more than three years. We are asking on behalf of the families of these persons in military court martial when they are civilians against the decision of the Constitutional court.

We are asking on behalf of the families of the Muslims community which is under persecution, whose clerics have been shot while on handcuffs and nobody is responding. We are asking on behalf of the fishing communities who have been haunted and hounded, whose members have been killed by men in uniform, and nobody is willing to listen to them. We ask these questions on behalf of the civil society, the media, who have been muzzled and we are demanding for a commitment on civic space.

These issues have been around for some time now; one would ask, is there anything that has triggered the current action?

The triggers are the same; the lack of concern, the desire to consider them as normal yet they are not. The other day you saw how they treated our party president. A few days ago, you heard how the police thought it is their business to allow us to open our party headquarters. We see a pattern of trying to usurp the provisions of the Constitution and we are saying no.

When we thought that at some stage the regime will back down and release political prisoners, that have been in detention without charge to no avail. The clear lack of commitment by the regime is the spark for us to say, we are going down the sewer if we don’t put our foot down on these issues.

There is a view that you should make parliament impossible to sit even for the NRM side until these issues are concluded. What do you make of that position?

It is their view, not mine. I’m here with the team and every day a matter arises, we sit and mull over the issues and decide the course of action. We have refused to be impulsive and decided to move with clarity so that nobody tries to circumvent the issues. Whether people are going to sit and elect to go without us, for whom are they legislating?

They are legislating for the same people who are sending us to make these demands. Whether they are going to go all the way and neglect our demands, it’s their business but they will remain legitimate.

What was the thinking to allow MPs to continue attending committee meetings?

Because committees are not in the control of the executive. We are making these demands to the executive. The committees are purely occupied by MPs and the questions are not theirs. Therefore, it will really be misinterpreted if we decided to stifle the committees.

We have seen NRM people calling you grandstanders; and that your boycotts mean nothing. How do you respond to that?

I think a big section of the NRM people are simply excited with power and not so many of them take off the time to understand the issues and I can comfortably say they have the right to ignorance.

My space is to amplify the voice of the voiceless and the ignorant will wait for their food, they are just food eaters but there are serious NRM people who are following these issues and are equally concerned; probably they lack the courage to speak out. But that category of the ignorant you will find everywhere and I’m not shocked.

bakerbatte@gmail.com

This is a better Uganda parliamentary stand off on the part of the Opposition against what is currently happening in this country. One understands that the banned kabakayekka political party is in appreciation of what the parliament of Uganda is trying to do under the immense pressures of the dictatorial Republican executive. The National Unity Platform seems to be a worthwhile friendship to join with under the membership of kabakayekka political party.It seems that these are the African political and cultural times when the banned political party of kabakayekka wakes up to the unfortunate realities of happenings in this country.
One remembers very well when the independence of Buganda and that of Uganda was approaching 1961, when many hard core KY Ganda tribes people used to wear their made in Buganda, brown bark cloth hats with pride.


We were very young then. We could not understand a thing or two! They were thanking their God because the dictatorial rule of colonial Great Britain was going away. Omugenyi bwakyala akyaluka!

 

 

The President of Uganda does not want foreign investors who put up industries in this country to pay taxes.

5 November, 2023

By World Media

 


President Museveni (L) at Hariss factory

 

President Yoweri Museveni has warned government agencies in charge of taxation from imposing direct taxes on large-scale manufacturers.

This, Museveni said discourages investment. Speaking at Hariss International, the producers of Riham products, at their factory in Kawempe, Museveni said he doesn’t want tax agencies to disturb "my manufacturers" with what he called "useless" taxes.

“I long ago told everybody concerned that what we lack in Uganda is manufacturing but everything else is there such as peace, infrastructure, among others. Therefore, if somebody is in manufacturing, I don't want you to disturb him with direct taxes because they are not crucial to us. If somebody builds a factory like this one and he employs 2,000 people and he pays them, we shall benefit indirectly. Let him work and give jobs to our people,” said Museveni.

President commended the chairman of Hariss International Limited, Yasser Ahmed for contributing to the development of Uganda's economy. Since its inception in 2005, the company has evolved and expanded its portfolio to more than 50 products such as carbonated soft drinks, natural mineral water, fruit juices, malt & energy drinks, biscuits and sweets among others.

“I want to congratulate Yasser for doing such a good work because what you are doing here is what is needed in Uganda. As you can see from our location on the globe, we are a very strong agricultural country, everything grows here, and we have been growing products since time immemorial. If you read the accounts of the first Europeans who came here like Hannington Speke who came in 1862 and Henry Morton Stanley who came in 1889, they were amazed by the agriculture they found here,” added Museveni.

The president explained that as leaders, they knew that Uganda has a very big economic potential and that is why they managed to transform it into a big dairy-producing country and that very soon it will overtake many countries in the world which produce milk and milk products.

“When the Europeans came, they tried to link us through a few products. That is why by independence, Uganda's economy was being described as the economy of the 3Cs (coffee, cotton and copper) and 3Ts (tobacco, tourism and tea). Now this was a very narrow range of products, and we knew it. And us, who through the school system and had been exposed to the global economy, we knew that Uganda had a very big potential not only for the 3Cs and 3Ts, but for very many other things,” the president asserted.

“Therefore, when people like Yasser came, we had already started promoting the growing of fruits. In the past, fruits were just for children to eat, not commercial but we knew that they were commercial. If you see on the internet, the global demand for fruits and fruit products is very big. We woke up our people to start growing fruits and they woke up a bit like in Soroti, Luwero, Kayunga and Masaka. They started growing pineapples, oranges and mangoes but we didn't have processors, and this is what has been delaying our people. Now in Kabale, I introduced apples. Also, Uganda is coming up as a big grape and apple grower in the cold areas," he said.

Museveni also described Yasser's investment as a saviour in Uganda since it links fruit producers with the internal market.

“Eventually we want to be linked with the external market because it is bigger. I therefore thank and congratulate you. You go and tell all the Lebanese to come here because Lebanese are very hardworking people.

On his part, Yasser Ahmed thanked the president for supporting investors like him.

“We want to show you that we have fulfilled what we committed to you in 2017 and this is the evidence, you see here in Ttula. The total investment for what you see here is almost $100 million. In 2017, our number of employees was 1,380 and now it is 2,000 workers directly and 5,000 indirectly,” said Yasser.

Nb

One has a different opinion from this well educated African man. His job is all about living and sleeping on the country's taxes.
His expensive transport to work and his big breakfast and dinner are all paid for by the tax payer. What if the Uganda thirsty customers start to boycott Yasser Ahamed's products because his rich company does not pay VAT in Uganda but his foreign company pays lots of income tax in war torn Lebanon?

 

 

 

In Uganda, during the second Lockdown there are Over 100 bar owners who have decided to change business:

9th August, 2021

 

By Benson Tumusiime

Big Zone Restaurant in premises that were previously occupied by Big Zone Bar in Nansana Municipality, Wakiso District. PHOTO/RACHEL MABALA

 

At least 100 bar owners in Kampala Metropolitan area have changed business due to the prolonged government shutdown over the Covid-19 pandemic.

On March 18, 2020, President Museveni imposed the first lockdown to contain the spread of Covid-19, directing, among others, all bars and entertainment centres to close.

Since then, the bars are still closed although some other businesses have since been reopened.
Mr George Pambason, the secretary general of Legit Bar Owners Association, says more than 100 bar owners have changed business because they were stuck with bank loans, rent arrears and utility bills plus payment of workers.

He, however, says the bar owners have had engagements with the government about possible assistance.
“We have expressed our grievances to them and we hope that with time the government shall consider us as well,” Mr Pambason says.

“We now have the issues with the landlords because of the accumulated rent arrears, the landlords now don’t want to know that we have been in lockdown. We have also requested the Uganda Law Society to provide us with the legal definition of the lockdown so that we can present it before Parliament and government can talk to land lords,” he adds.

Mr Pambason says the lockdown has affected 60,000 registered bars countrywide, leaving an unspecified number of employees unemployed.

Mr Medard Rugubwa, aka Younger, the proprietor of Big Zone Entertainment Centre in Nansana Municipality, Wakiso District, says the lockdown has affected him financially.

“Here at Big Zone, I lost my bouncer because he lost the job and he failed to maintain himself in Kampala. Because of pressure and debts, he ended up being hospitalised and eventually died,” Mr Rugubwa says.

“As Legit association, we lost three prominent businessmen in the industry who were the owners of Happy Boys Bar in Namasuba and Nexus Bar in Najera,” he adds.

Mr Rugubwa, who also doubles as public relations officer for the bar owners association, says he has also changed the business.

“Before the lockdown, my bar was doing well with very many clients because I also used to host musicians. On special days such as Friday, Saturday and Sunday, I could make sales of Shs10 million per day. Then I also cater for more than 100 people who were my employees, but since the lockdown, everything went down,” he adds.

 
 

A retail shop in the premises previously occupied by Vision Congo Bar in Kabalagala, Makindye Division. PHOTO/RACHEL MABALA

 

Mr Rugubwa said he has rent arrears of Shs125 million and a bank mortgage of Shs1.2 billion.


“My music system and other machines have been destroyed, including a number of television sets. Therefore, I don’t know whether I shall recover. This situation has forced me to start a mini restaurant and a boutique so that I can also survive,” he explains.

He adds that by the time the lockdown was imposed last year, his bar had a stock of Shs150 million, which all went to waste.

“I used part of my stock to feed some of the employees so that they can keep the place. Part of the stock was sold to supermarkets cheaply and others were damaged since they were not long life products,” he adds.

Asked which of the bar and restaurant business is more profitable, Mr Rugubwa says: “Me I know the bar business very well. So I have found running restaurant business very challenging to the extent that I can’t even get 10 customers a day.”

“But because I have no choice, I am hanging in there for survival as we hope for the best in future,” he adds.
Mr Bruce Kiggundu, the manager of LA Breeze Bar in Nakulabye, Rubaga Division, says when the lockdown started, he could not sustain running the business anymore because he had many loans.

“When we were put in lockdown, my boss told me to look for some people who can buy the available stock and we leave the place. We sold the stock cheaply and left the business. Currently it is called Nakulabye Furniture Centre,” he says.

Mr Denis Kaka, the manager of Vision Congo in Kabalagala, Makindye Division, says the business was owned by two Congolese nationals. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uganda Government energy policy has failed to extend financing, to solar companies, to achieve the required United Nation sustainable development timetable: 

17 July, 2020

 

By Jamidah Namuyanja 

Energy is an important factor for human development as underscored in the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG7).

SDG7 seeks to ensure access to affordable, sustainable, reliable, and modern energy for all by the year 2030. Despite this target, 789 million people worldwide, the majority of whom live in sub-Saharan Africa, lack access to electricity.

 

Marius Korsnes stands in front of a solar cell plant in China during one of his study trips to China. Photo: Private

 

This is according to the State of the Global Mini-Grids Market Report 2020 published by Sustainable Energy for All (SE4ALL) and Bloomberg.

For centuries, energy has fostered economic development and created wealth for nations. For example, the 18th Century British industrial revolution was heavily driven by coal. In the Middle East and the United States, sectors such as aviation, agriculture, health, manufacturing, education, and most recently, the technology revolution, have been largely powered by proceeds from oil and gas.

There is, therefore a clear correlation between energy and economic development. World economic powerhouses like the United States, Britain, Germany, and China whose energy access levels are high score very highly on the human development index in comparison to those with low energy access like Uganda.
Globally, past decades have seen over-reliance on fossil fuels to power industries and households.

However, with technology innovations and climate change awareness and adaptation measures taking root, there is a shift towards renewable energy utilisation with sources like solar, wind, water (hydro- which, is the major energy source for Uganda), biomass, and geothermal gaining prominence.

 

Solar cells are now being built in rural areas, too. Photo: Marius Korsnes

 

Development partners are leading the transition to renewable energy given its affordability and ease of maintenance, especially for small scale businesses and households.

For instance, at the recent Global Off-grid Forum and Expo held in Nairobi, Kenya, organised by GOGLA - the global association for the off-grid solar energy industry and the World Bank’s - Lighting Global, investors agreed to support the growth of the off-grid solar market and accelerate universal access to affordable and sustainable energy by 2030.

The solar sector in Uganda is only two decades old, but its impact on the overall economy has not gone unnoticed in terms of employment, powering agriculture, lighting up schools, homes, businesses, and health centres in remote off-grid communities.

Despite government’s emphasis on increasing grid connections through heavy investment in the construction of hydro-power plants over the years, only about 5 per cent of rural Ugandans have access to energy as per the Electricity Connections Policy 2018-2027.

This has affected household incomes and left many Ugandans stuck in abject poverty as they are unable to engage even in the most basic economic activity.

It is impossible for a rural farmer to improve production and add value to his produce without a reliable energy source. Solar companies in Uganda have sought to change this narrative by providing affordable solutions such as pay-go, where customers pay for solar power systems in daily, weekly, or monthly instalments.

Although the pay-go model has spurred increased access to energy due to its ability to include low-level earners, it has not been without pitfalls. Lack of access to affordable and patient financing is a major hindrance to the growth of many solar energy companies in Uganda, making business expansion difficult.

 

This photo shows offshore wind power in Rudong – a rapidly growing industry. Photo: Marius Korsnes

 

It limits the number of clients they can offer products on models such as pay-go and remain operating. Unfavourable taxes by the government, with companies being taxed differently for similar items, also makes importation of solar products and accessories burdensome.

Other challenges include poor, regulatory and policy environment, which pits off-grid energy solutions against on-grid electricity hence creating a negative perception that deters investment; limited collaboration between government and the private sector when implementing the off-grid strategy as well as limited consumer awareness on the value of off-grid products.

Government can remedy this situation and ensure that the country meets its SD7 target by extending financial subsidies to the solar sector and integrating off-grid solutions in its rural electrification plans.

Ms Jamidah Namuyanja is the communications&membership officer
Uganda Solar Energy Association.
info@useaug.org

 

 

 

 

 

 

In Uganda, old time African farm management practice of pastoralisim is contributing to the destruction of the delicate environment in the so called African cattle grassland corridors:

Meat prices for cattle ranchers have fallen to Shs 1,000(40 pence) a kg of meat as a massive dry spell hits Nakasongola:

Written by URN

 Misair Ssenyange a butcher slaughtering a cow that collapsed at Wabbale village in Naksongola town. The meat was sold at Shs 1000 per kilogram

Misairi Ssenyange, a butcher slaughtering a cow that collapsed at Wabbale village in Naksongola town. The meat was sold at at give away prices.

 

The price of meat has drastically fallen in Nakasongola district as scores of cattle continue to die on a daily basis due to lack of water and pasture. A kilogram of meat now costs a paltry Shs 1,000, down from Shs 10,000 while a cow goes for as low as Shs 50,000. 

Samuel Kasirye, the prime minister of Buruuli chiefdom explains that the valley dams constructed by both the district and private farmers dried up in August 2018, leaving pastoralists desperate, with no water to sustain their animals. 

 

Kasirye adds that the rains expected in early March did not come, forcing herdsmen to trek long distances for water and pasture. He says that because of the long distances, animal collapse along the way and die.  

"Animals are dying everyday and each animal is costing between Shs 20,000 and Shs 30,000 because once it cannot move, then the owner has to sell it off." said Kasirye. 

The most affected pastoralists are from the sub-counties of Nabiswera, Lwabyata, Kalungi, and Wabinyonyi. Joseph Muruli, a pastoralist at Kawondwe village, Kalungi sub-county says he has lost over 10 head of cattle so far. He adds that he now spends between Shs 70,000 and Shs 200,000 per day to fuel a truck to fetch water from a distant valley dam to enable other cattle to survive. 

 

Godfrey Byekwaso, a cattle trader in Nakasongola says that he now buys each cow at between Shs 50,000 and Shs 100,000. He says because of the high supply, they now sell a kilo of meat at Shs 1,000 within the community in Nakasongola.     

Fred Kasumba, a tax collector at Kansirye cattle market says that because of the dry spell, few cattle is now able to reach the market. He says the market used to attract over 300 head of cattle but currently they are only 100 head of cattle which are also in bad shape.  

Wabbale valley dam located on the outskirts of Nakasongola town is the only available water source serving over 700 head of cattle per day from Nakasongola town, Wabinyonyi and Nabiswera among sub-counties. There are fears that it may equally dry up due to the high water consumption. 

Eva Najja, a resident of Wabbale village says that they are worried that if rains don’t fall soon, people may also start dying because they compete with animals for water at valley dam. Pastoralists and residents have asked the government to invest in water for production.  

There over 264,000 head of cattle in Nakasongola district. But, at least 500 of them are lost during the dry spell each year according to district veterinary office estimates. According to a statement from the Uganda National Meteorological Authority (UNMA) the dry spell conditions are expected to prevail over most parts of the country until late March 2019.  

The Authority boss, Dr Festus Luboyera said in a March 12 statement said that the current dry spell is a result of the tropical cyclone (storm) named ‘IDAI’, which has been over Mozambique and Madagascar. He observes that this tropical cyclone led to the development of a low-pressure system around the Mozambique Channel, which resulted into the weakening of the Southeasterly trade winds in mid-march.

"These winds became diverted towards the channel, depriving moisture-laden winds to reach our country, which is why we have experienced dry spells that have disrupted the onset of March to May seasonal rainfall,” Luboyera said.      

Doctor Sam Eswaggu, the Nakasongola district veterinary officer and Sam Kigula the LC V chairman of Nakasongola said they were outside the district and unable to comment on the issue. However, Eswaggu has been quoted previously saying that the problem has been worsened by the fact that some pastoralists have overstocked animals yet they have meagre resources to look after them.

 
Nb
The confusion between the different officials in government is uncalled for.

These Ganda Agricaultural territories have been invaded by so many ambitious pastoralists.

Their poor farm management is messing up the environment as in the territory of Karamoja and no one seems to mind.

Really if these so called cattle corridors had wild animals as it was milion of years ago, the natural balance of nature would be keeping these lands, wet, fertile and alive to sustain life!
 
 
Interesting that these obdurate African pastoralists are learning the hard way that overstocking cattle and stealing thousands of acres of grasslands on which to graze this cattle has its limitations and the whole enterprise can lead to financial loss and destruction.

Because certainly if the huge Sahara desert continues to come South on to the Equator, the African meat production industry will gradually disappear by the year 2060.
 
 
There has to come a time, and that time should be now, when Uganda starts thinking of putting a stop to this scourge that is pastoralism.

This practice was acceptable in the age when both the human population and its impact on the environment were negligible.

Today, this isn’t the case. Uganda, already in a region struggling with a high population density, will have over 100 million inhabitants in 30 years time. This is a truly shocking number. No advanced economy would be able to handle such a massive growth in such a short space of time.

We need to rethink our ways 

Pastoralism should therefore be one of those practices that are critically examined, and done away with if need be. We cannot carry on with the old ways like this any longer.
 
 
 
 
 

Understanding mailo land and dual ownership of land in Uganda:

February 10, 2019

Written by Geoffrey Mulindwa

The statistics of the Struggle for the resource of land in Uganda

 

The Mailo land tenure system is one of the most complex among Uganda’s four tenure system.

Its ambiguity leaves many people mistaking it for the Freehold tenure system. While these two tenure systems have some similarities, they are by far different. Mailo land has its origins in the 1900 agreement which was signed between the regents of Buganda, acting on behalf of the young Sir Daudi Chwa, and Sir Harry Johnson on behalf of the queen of England.

This agreement divided the 19,600 square miles that form Buganda kingdom among different entities and individuals. These included the Kabaka (king), regents, chiefs, central government, key offices and other individuals who were found fit.

Before we delve much into the distribution of this land, let us first understand Uganda’s four tenure systems. The first one is customary land tenure; this is land that is held basing on particular customs, traditions and norms of people. It is often communal. It is commonly owned by indigenous communities in Uganda.

Such land is found in the northern and eastern parts of the country. Freehold tenure system; under this system, one owns land for eternity and he/she is entitled to a certificate of title. In Uganda, this is the most favoured tenure.

Leasehold tenure; this is where a lessee has exclusive possession of land through an agreement with the landlord. The agreement is for a specific period of time subject to premium and ground rent. Mailo land tenure; This is the most misunderstood tenure in Uganda simply because it creates dual ownership over the same piece of land.

Mailo land owners have the same rights as freehold land owners, but they must respect the rights of lawful and bonafide occupants and Kibanja holders to occupy and live on the land. (Section 3 (4) of the Land Act). Buganda Land Board operations are largely based on Mailo land and there have been some divergent voices over this land because many people find it hard to understand how Mailo land works.

Buganda’s land falls in the category of Official Mailo land which means it cannot be sold entirely but can accommodate bibanja holders as well as lease holders. Hereunder are a few descriptions of key terms used on this land tenure. Kibanja holders; Persons who had settled on the land in Buganda as customary tenants with the consent of the Mailo land owner under the Busuulu and Envujjo Law, 1928.

A Kibanja holder holds an equitable interest in mailo land which can be transferred with consent of a registered owner. It is worth noting that kibanja is peculiar to Mailo land found mostly in Buganda Bonafide occupant; A Bonafide occupant is one who, before the coming into force of the Constitution 1995—

(a) Had occupied and utilized or developed any land unchallenged by the registered owner or agent of the registered owner for twelve years or more; or

(b) Had been settled on land by the Government or an agent of the Government, which may include a local authority. Lawful occupant; This means a person who entered the land with the consent of the registered owner, and includes a purchaser.

For this article we will go with this definition though a lawful occupant is also one who occupies land by virtue of the repealed— (i) Busuulu and Envujjo Law of 1928; (ii) Toro Landlord and Tenant Law of 1937;(iii) Ankole Landlord and Tenant Law of 1937.

Tenant by occupancy; These include bonafide and lawful tenants. They are considered tenants of the registered owner of the land which they occupy and are required to pay annual ground rent. (Sections 1 and 31 of the Land Act).

Most people in Buganda are tenants by occupancy and are required to pay Busuulu. a. Rights and Duties of Tenants by Occupancy and Kibanja Holders

1. Tenants by occupancy have a right to occupy land under the laws of Uganda.

2. They have the right to enter transactions with respect to the land they occupy with the consent of the registered land owner, which should not be denied on unreasonable grounds. (Section 34 of the Land Act).

3. The law strictly requires tenants by occupancy to give the landowner first option where they wish to sell their interest and vice versa where a land owner wants to sell the land. This must be on a willing buyer willing seller basis. (Section 35 of the Land Act).

4. Where a tenant by occupancy or Kibanja holder sells their interest without giving the land owner first option, he or she commits an offence and loses the right to occupy the land. (Land (Amendment) Act 2010). 

5. A person who buys registered land which has tenants by occupancy must respect and observe their rights.

6. He or she must not evict them except if he or she obtains a court order of eviction for non-payment of the annual nominal ground rent. (Section 32A of the Land Act as amended in 2010).

7. Similarly, any person who buys registered land in Buganda must observe the rights of Kibanja holders on the land.

8. Tenants by occupancy and Kibanja holders can also register a caveat at the Registry of Lands where they have reason to suspect that the registered landowner intends to enter a land transaction which will affect their rights and interests. (Section 139 of the Registration of Titles Act).

One can only secure their land by knowing the tenure he or she is under, his duties and responsibilities on the said piece of land.

 

The chart to show why land users are not serious enough to want to register land in Uganda.

 

 

 

 

 

The dodgy Basajja Shs11.5b compensation claim for Uganda Broadcasting Corporation land-buy, has been placed into the hands of the Inspector of Government business:

The ambitious businessman Mr Hassan Basajjabalaba who has lost money trying to buy the government land.

The dilapitated UBC building that should have been modernized to international standards by now.

By Ephraim Kasozi

2nd February, 2019

 

 

The compensation claim for refund of Shs11.5b by businessman Hassan Basajjabalaba for the botched sale of 23-acre piece of land belonging to the Uganda Broadcasting Corporation (UBC) has been challenged before the Inspectorate of Government.
It is alleged that Mr Basajjabalaba through his Haba Group Ltd is seeking to recover Shs11.5 billion after courts of law rendered the transactions and sale agreement of the land at Bugolobi null and void.
The dispute arose from a February 2011 sale agreement between UBC and Haba Group Ltd for the 23.1-acre of land comprised in freehold volume on Farady Road at Bugolobi, Kampala.

Call for investigation
In a January 25 complaint, a whistleblower has asked the Inspector General of Government (IGG), Justice Irene Mulyagonja, to investigate ‘irregular and fraudulent manoeuvre by some government officials to refund Shs11.5 billion to Haba Group Uganda Ltd.
The complaint states that the High Court dismissed a case in which Haba Group had sued UBC and its former managing director Paul Kihika and also ordered the cancellation of the sale agreement to reinstate UBC as the registered proprietor and a decree was extracted.
“In the unanimous ruling, the Court of Appeal reviewed the ruling of the High Court and ordered that no order to UBC to refund Shs11.5 billion to Haba Group was ever made by the High Court judge and that even if it had been made, it would have been made in error, having declared the agreement of sale of the suit property to have been illegal, null and void, court cannot sanction an illegality or be used to enforce an obligation arising out of an illegal contract,” the complaint reads in part.
When contacted, Ms Munira Ali, the public relations officer at the Inspectorate, said: “We received the compliant and it is being reviewed by the IGG for action.”
The complaint follows several correspondences in regard to payment of the disputed money after the courts of law decided.
In a January 2017 letter, the Speaker of Parliament, Ms Rebecca Kadaga, asked the Secretary to the Treasury to expeditiously attend to the demand by Haba Group to avoid interest accumulating on the said money.
Ms Kadaga cited a petition lodged on behalf of Haba Group that sought intervention regarding failure of UBC to refund the money.
On April 6, 2018, Ms Kadaga wrote that her office continued to receive petitions on the matter yet the directive contained in the resolution (of Parliament) was clear.

Deputy AG’s opinion
In a legal opinion to the Secretary to the Treasury dated January 10, 2018, Deputy Attorney General Mwesigwa Rukutana said the issue of refund and or forfeiture of Shs11.5b to government by Haba Group was conclusively dealt with at the High Court where it was held on February 24, 2012, that it would be improper to allow government to be unjustly enriched.
“…it is my considered opinion that Haba Group is entitled to be refunded the full sum of Shs11.5b as was ordered by the High Court and recommended by the Rt Hon Speaker of Parliament in her letter dated April 6,2018,’ reads the opinion.
He added: “Government stands at risk of refunding the full amount in issue together with accumulated interest, damages and costs of litigation, if the refund is not made.”
But the complaint states: “…court refused to be used as an instrument to enforce the illegal transaction and having rejected the notion of a refund, is it in order for the Speaker of Parliament to resolve to refund Shs11.5b to Haba Group given the doctrine of separation of powers and independence of the Judiciary.”
The complaint alleges that the opinion of the Deputy Attorney General and that of the Speaker of Parliament create an impression as if a statutory notice has been served upon his office allegedly to recover Shs11.5b with interest.
“He is intentionally blowing the case out of proportion by creating fear to the Ministry of Finance to irregularly pay.”

 

 

 

 

 

THE COUNTRY OF UGANDA IS IN MORE THAN 60-YEARS IN  CONFLICT WITHOUT MUCH MODERN DEVELOPMENT ON THE GROUND(PART 2):

President Museveni with his Country of Uganda and the flag since 1962

 

The King of Buganda with the Kingdom flag. A Kingdom State within a Republican State.

THE COUNTRY OF UGANDA IS MORE THAN 60-YEARS IN  CONFLICT WITHOUT MUCH MODERN DEVELOPMENT ON THE GROUND(PART 2):

Once bitten, never shy:

24 December, 2009  and Reproduced 4 November, 2018

Written by Henry Lubega

Kabaka Mutesa sent (without) packing, again

This is the second part of our special series on the tug of war between Buganda and the central government, putting this year's bloody clashes and the continuing stand-off in a historical context. The first part showed how the current conflict is uncannily similar to the clashes of 1966 and 1953. In this part, HENRY LUBEGA takes a closer look at how Kabaka Edward Mutesa fell out with the colonial authorities, and then with the Obote government, with disastrous consequences for king, kingdom and country:


President Milton Obote’s attack on Kabaka Edward Mutesa in 1966 is widely regarded as the beginning of the culture of repression and use of the gun to settle differences that bedevils Uganda to this day.

 

The flight of the Kabaka into exile remains one of the darkest moments in Buganda’s history. Yet long before Uganda’s independence in 1962, there were already strong signs that Buganda would, at best, have an uneasy relationship with the central government. In the 1920s and 30s, the British considered forming a closer union among their East African colonies – Kenya, Uganda and Tanganyika, as Tanzania was then known.

The idea was vehemently opposed in Uganda, especially by the Baganda. They feared that the federation would open doors to European settlers, as had happened in Kenya, and that their ancient kingdom, with its treasured culture, would be swallowed up in a bigger East Africa. The idea was shelved, but not completely discarded. Following the appointment of Andrew Cohen as the governor of the Uganda Protectorate, a memorandum on Constitutional Development and Reform in Buganda was signed by the Governor and Kabaka Edward Mutesa in March 1953.

The memorandum stated that “Uganda had been and would continue to be developed as a unitary state.” 
A few months later, the governor announced changes that included an increase in African representation in the Legislative Council, the Governor’s Executive Council, and having the majority of the Lukiiko members elected, not appointed by the Kabaka. These reforms were the prelude to the 1953 crisis that saw Kabaka Mutesa exiled to England. The Lukiiko was, in particular, opposed to having an increase in elected members.

However, Mutesa convinced the Lukiiko to accept the move, reasoning that it would then be harder for the governor to ignore the views of a largely elected Lukiiko. But as the tension over the increase of elected members of the Lukiiko subsided, a fresh burst of anger was stirred up by what Mutesa called a “careless remark” by the Secretary of State for Colonies, Oliver Lyttleton.

On June 30, 1953, Lyttleton, making a speech to the East African Dinner Club in London, said: “Nor should we exclude from our minds the evolution, as time goes on, of still wider measures of unification and possibly still larger measures of federation of the whole East African territories.” 
There was immediate protest from Buganda, whose old fears about East African federation, and the loss of the kingdom’s special position in Uganda, were re-ignited.

“It was clear that a crisis was under way. The mention of federation in East Africa was enough to bring all Baganda anxiety frothing to the surface,” Mutesa wrote in his book The Desecration of My Kingdom.
In protest, the Kabaka agreed to the Lukiiko’s request not to nominate members to the Legislative Council.

Kabaka sent (without) packing

Mutesa, however, held confidential talks with Cohen. He writes, “We drafted what was to be seen as joint statements by the two of us, which I was to read to the Lukiiko. [I] withdrew my demands and accepted the re-assurances already given…our talks had been confidential, I had already been refused permission to tell the Lukiiko what was happening.”

Mutesa wanted to inform the Lukiiko of this tricky situation, much to the governor’s displeasure. “We had reached a curious position where Sir Andrew demanded that I should use all my power to help him implement a policy of which I disapproved as strongly as they (Lukiiko) did.”

“The struggle was now personal, courtesy collapsing. Sir Andrew was talking in threats, and he finally asserted: ‘If you don’t agree, you will have to go.’ My reply was: ‘If anyone has to go, it will certainly be you’.”

The protectorate government withdrew its recognition of the Kabaka on November 20, 1953, on grounds that he had failed to give royal co-operation to Her Majesty’s Government as required by article 6 of the 1900 Buganda Agreement. On November 27, Sir Andrew sent Mutesa an ultimatum to meet his demands. Mutesa insisted on consulting the Lukiiko. Three days later, on November 30, Mutesa was given deportation orders.

“I asked if this meant that I was under arrest and was told that it did. [I had] a hazy feeling that perhaps I should shoot this man.”
He didn’t, as without even a piece of luggage, Mutesa was flown aboard a Royal Air Force plane to Tangmere in Sussex, England. A state of emergency was declared in Buganda. The non-cooperation, which followed between Mengo and the protectorate government, forced the Governor to invite Sir Keith Hancock to head a committee that included leading Baganda to resolve the crisis.

This committee, which sat at Namirembe, led to the Namirembe Conference, which was the basis of the Buganda Agreement and Constitution of 1955. The agreement paved the way for Mutesa’s return from exile. The 1955 agreement left Buganda, and especially the Kabaka, in a weakened position. Although the colonial government agreed not to raise the issue of the East African Federation “either at the present time or while local public opinion on the issue remains as it is at the present time”, it did not rule out resurrecting the question in future.

More significantly, the agreement made the Kabaka, a constitutional monarch, spelling out the limits of his powers and those of the Lukiiko. His ministers were also given some political powers, thereby creating different centres of power. All major decisions by the Kabaka and the Lukiiko, including the appointment of ministers, would be subject to the approval of the governor.

Down but not out

Only three years later, however, another clash occurred between the Mengo and protectorate governments over the issue of direct election of Buganda’s representatives in the Legislative Council. As a result, from 1958 to 1961, Buganda was not represented. Towards the end of 1958, the appointed Lukiiko passed a resolution terminating all the agreements signed between Buganda kings and Her Majesty’s Government. They demanded that powers that had been surrendered to the crown government should be returned to the Kabaka.

The Secretary of State for Colonies, Lord Iain Macleod, met the Kabaka in August 1960 with a delegation from the Lukiiko to iron out their differences, as the country prepared for the 1961 elections that would pave the way for independence. Buganda’s response was two fold: boycott the elections and declare the kingdom’s own independence.

In September 1960, the Lukiiko submitted a memorandum to the Queen, outlining a “plan for an independent Buganda”. Under the plan, an independent Buganda would maintain friendly relations with Her Majesty’s Government, remain a member of the Commonwealth, and seek admission to the United Nations. Buganda would have her own army with the Kabaka as commander in chief.

Arrangements for Buganda’s independence were to be completed by December 31, 1960. On January 1, 1961, the Lukiiko declared Buganda’s independence. Little effort, however, was made to bring the declared independence into reality. As the Lukiiko had decided to boycott the March 1961 elections, it asked people in Buganda not to register for the elections. Some Baganda, however, chose to participate.

The two main parties contesting the elections were the Uganda Peoples Congress (UPC) headed by Apollo Milton Obote and the Democratic Party (DP) led by Benedicto Kiwanuka. Both parties shared the view that Uganda should continue as a united country. They viewed Buganda’s demands as a threat to that unity as the country moved towards independence. DP won 20 of the 21 seats on offer in Buganda. Having secured another 23 in other parts of the country against UPC’s 35, the Democratic Party formed the government headed by Benedicto Kiwanuka as Chief Minister.

Having failed to secede and the future of the Kabaka and the kingdom in an independent Uganda being uncertain, Buganda changed strategy. It decided to push for a federal status, which would ensure the continued existence of the kingdom, and secure for the Kabaka a superior position within an independent Uganda. In June 1961, thousands of Baganda chanting “Kabaka Yekka” (only the king) staged demonstrations against the government of Benedicto Kiwanuka, whom they viewed as a traitor.

“Kiwanuka’s sins were threefold. He was a Catholic who had opposed the Protestant establishment in the Kingdom of Buganda; he had fought the [1961] election despite the boycott declared by the Kabaka’s government, he was a Muganda and a commoner who had dared to set himself above the Kabaka,” writes I.R. Hancock in the Journal of African History (1970). This anti-Kiwanuka movement led to the founding of Kabaka Yekka (KY) as a political party to fight DP and to promote Buganda’s tribal interests.

 

URL: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=namukwakula 

 

Kabaka, Obote jump into bed

At the first Constitutional Conference in London in September 1961, also known as the first Lancaster Conference, to negotiate Uganda’s independence, Benedicto Kiwanuka, as the Chief Minister, vehemently opposed the idea of having Buganda’s representatives to the National Assembly indirectly elected. He knew that DP would stand no chance of winning elections in Buganda in a process controlled by Mengo.

UPC, which had been completely beaten by DP in Buganda in the March 1961 elections, smelt an opportunity to dislodge DP from government by allying with Buganda. The UPC delegation, therefore, sided with Buganda, marking the birth of the ill-fated UPC-Buganda alliance.

In March 1962, direct elections to the Lukiiko were held in Buganda for the first time. In a deal with KY, UPC did not contest any seat. KY easily beat DP, taking 65 out of the 68 seats.  Since it had been agreed that Buganda’s representatives to the National Assembly would be elected indirectly, with the Lukiiko serving as the electoral college, KY’s victory meant that DP had no chance of remaining in power.

When the April 1962 general elections were held, DP won 24 seats and UPC 37. The Lukiiko’s indirect vote handed 21 seats to KY. As agreed earlier, UPC and KY formed a coalition government with Milton Obote as Prime Minister, ahead of Uganda’s independence on October 9, 1962.

Through a constitutional amendment, a provision was made for the non-executive positions of President and Vice President, to be elected by the National Assembly. On October 4, 1963, five days before the country’s first independence anniversary, Sir Edward Mutesa was elected President and Sir Wilberforce Nadiope, the Kyabazinga of Busoga, Vice President.

From the start, the UPC-KY alliance was doomed to fail. While UPC presented itself as a national, progressive party espousing national unity, KY was unashamedly tribal and conservative, pushing for Mengo’s interests.

The only thing the two had in common was the desire to kick DP out of power. As Samwiri Karugire wrote in A Political History of Uganda (1980), “the coalition between the UPC and the Mengo government was a cynic’s delight because the two parties had divergent views on almost every conceivable subject”. It did not take long, therefore, for the two to clash.

Honeymoon ends early

Once in power, Obote started moves to weaken Mengo’s influence. Through patronage and promises of rewards, Obote got a number of KY members in the National Assembly to switch allegiances to UPC. In January 1963, UPC decided to field candidates against KY candidates for two seats in the Buganda Lukiiko but failed. Although the UPC-KY alliance prohibited UPC from opening branches in Buganda, Obote felt strong enough by early 1964 to do so. The remaining KY members considered forming an alliance with DP.

The election of the Kabaka as president had been seen as an effort to bridge the rift between Mengo and the rest of the country, but it seemed to have the opposite effect. The Prime Minister and the President were jostling for state power.

Even on seemingly trivial things, such as whose picture appeared where, became a matter of contention. The constant display of the Prime Minister’s portrait rather than that of the President when playing the national anthem on national television, for example, displeased Mutesa and his supporters.

One of the main sources of disagreement between the Kabaka and the central government was the future of the “lost counties”, which had been taken from Bunyoro and given to Buganda by the colonial authorities, as a reward for its (Buganda’s) support.

The independence constitution had provided for a referendum in the “lost counties” for them to decide their fate. But as census figures showed that the Banyoro outnumbered the Baganda in the area, Buganda was strongly opposed to the referendum.
Despite Buganda’s opposition, the Obote-led government pushed ahead with the referendum in November 1964. Having gained a majority in the National Assembly, UPC was no longer reliant on KY support.

As expected, Buyaga and Bugangaizi counties voted in favour of returning to Bunyoro. The Kabaka’s government challenged the validity of the referendum in the High Court and lost. Its appeal in the Privy Council was dismissed in April 1965. The loss of the two counties to Bunyoro sparked off angry scenes among the Baganda in Kampala.

Buganda’s Katikkiro (Prime Minister), Michael Kintu, was blamed, forcing his government to resign. Kintu was replaced with Mayanja Nkangi, a former minister in the central government, who had resigned following the collapse of the UPC-KY alliance. Whereas UPC didn’t need KY any more, a fierce power struggle was raging between Milton Obote and the newly-elected Secretary General, Grace Ibingira, for the control of the party.

Ibingira, a cabinet minister, was elected Secretary General during the UPC delegates’ conference in December 1964, in Gulu. His aim, he later claimed, was “to build resilience in the UPC against Obote’s tendency to grab all power and promote militarism”. However, some historians say that on the contrary, Obote supported Ibingira’s bid against his critic, who was then incumbent Secretary General, John Kakonge.

Whatever the truth, Ibingira emerged as Obote’s main rival, gaining the support of the Prime Minister’s enemies, including Kabaka Mutesa and Buganda Kingdom. The stage was set for the 1966 crisis. The catalyst, however, didn’t come from Buganda or even Uganda, but Zaire, as the Democratic Republic of Congo was then known.

Amin takes centre stage

In January 1966, Daudi Ocheng, the former Secretary General of KY and a close friend of Edward Mutesa, attempted to move a motion in the National Assembly calling for an investigation of Deputy Army Commander, Col. Idi Amin, over corruption. The UPC parliamentary group refused to support it. He had tried to move the same motion earlier in 1965 without success.

Amin, who was seen as Obote’s confidant in the army, had been accused of involvement in gold and ivory smuggling during military operations in support of Congolese rebels in Eastern Congo. Milton Obote and some of his ministers, including Adoko Nekyon and Felix Onama, were being linked to the alleged smuggling.

Obote told cabinet and UPC parliamentarians that Amin had admitted to having large sums of money on his account, but it was money received from the Congolese rebel group to buy military supplies. The rebel group, headed by Christopher Gbenye and General Nicholas Oleng, was fighting the government of Moise Tshombe, who was seen by Obote as a traitor to the cause of African independence.

He had been involved in the assassination of Congolese independence leader, Patrice Lumumba. Obote had tried to keep support to the rebel group secret, since it had not been officially sanctioned by the government. During a cabinet meeting on February 4, while Obote and his key supporters were on a scheduled visit to West Nile, Grace Ibingira, a minister of state, mobilised his group to support the motion against Amin. Cuthbert Obwangor, who was then acting chairman of cabinet, didn’t have the numbers to block the decision. They asked Daudi Ocheng to re-table his motion.

The same day, February 4, Ocheng tabled the motion in the National Assembly. He accused Obote, Adoko Nekyon and Felix Onama of involvement in the gold and ivory scandal, along with Amin. The motion calling for suspension of Amin while investigations were conducted was adopted.

Obote interpreted the move as an attempt by Ibingira and his supporters, including Ocheng and Kabaka Mutesa, to overthrow his government with the backing of the Army Commander, Brig. Shaban Opolot. There were reports of mysterious troop movements in and out of Kampala in the following days, as the two sides sought to place loyal forces in the capital.

Gloves off in showdown

Upon his return to Kampala on February 13, Obote discovered that the Kabaka had approached the British High Commissioner seeking military assistance. He twice tried to reach the Kabaka by phone but failed. On February 15, Obote accepted to set up a commission of inquiry into the allegations against Amin, Nekyon and Onama. The commission was headed by Justice Sir Clement Negeon de L’estang of the Court of Appeal. He sent Amin on a two-week leave, short of the suspension demanded by the Ocheng motion. (In a report eventually published in August 1971, the commission exonerated Obote and the others).

While seemingly implementing the parliamentary motion, Obote also moved against his rivals. During a cabinet meeting on February 22, 1966, he arrested Grace Ibingira, the UPC Secretary General and Minister of State; Balaki  Kirya, Minister of Mineral and Water Resources; George Magezi, Minister of Housing and Labour; Dr. E.B.S. Lumu, Minister of Health, and Mathias Ngobi, Minister of Agriculture and Co-operatives.

The following day, he promoted Amin to take over the army command and moved Shaban Opolot to the newly created post of “military adviser” to the cabinet. To complete the coup against his own government, Obote suspended the 1962 Constitution, removing the Kabaka from the presidency and assuming all powers. In April 1966, Obote convened the National Assembly and had the changes ratified without debating the new Constitution. Obote became the executive president, with John Babiiha as his Vice President.
Baganda members of the National Assembly refused to swear allegiance to the new constitution. It was also rejected by the Lukiiko, a day after its adoption.

On May 20, 1966, the Kabaka’s government issued an ultimatum to the central government, ordering it to leave Buganda soil by the end of that month. Buganda chiefs were called upon to stir up rebellion in their respective areas while a number of Baganda flocked to the Kabaka’s palace in Mengo. Obote reacted by declaring a state of emergency in Buganda on May 23.

The following morning, on May 24, police was called in to intervene in the chaotic situation around the Kabaka’s palace. Later in the day, the Minister of Defence, Felix Onama, asked Obote to authorise the deployment of the army to “restore order”.

Obote sent in the army under the command of Idi Amin. He stormed the palace, overpowering the Kabaka’s guards who attempted to put up resistance. During the fighting, the Kabaka escaped by climbing over the wall. He fled to England through Rwanda. For a second time, Buganda’s conflict with the central government had ended with the Kabaka being forced into exile.

Who should be blamed for the 1966 crisis? To most Baganda, the answer is obvious: Milton Obote. However, some writers have pointed out that other actors, notably Kabaka Mutesa and his confidante Daudi Ocheng, the Mengo government and the Lukiiko, the ambitious Grace Ibingira, and even the tactless Benedicto Kiwanuka, should all share in the blame.

As historian Phares Mutibwa has written in Uganda Since Independence (1992), “In the final analysis, the issue between Mengo and the central government was the basic constitutional one of where power actually resided: in a local unit (Buganda) or with the central authority (Obote’s UPC government). Personalities came into the story merely as catalysts.”

The 1995 Constitution may have tried to answer the question, but it certainly didn’t answer it to the satisfaction of all parties, hence the current tussle between President Museveni and Kabaka Mutebi.

opusml@yahoo.co.uk

 

Buganda Kingdom : background

Buganda is the largest traditional kingdom within Uganda (the others are Toro, Ankole and Bunyoro, which make up part of the Western Region). During the colonial period, the British allowed the Kabaka (king) of Buganda and the rulers of the other states a large degree of power and influence, and this was retained a little while into independence. The kingdoms were abolished by Milton Obote in the 1960's but have recently been revived by President Yuseveni's government as a way of bringing government closer to the traditional feelings of the people. 
Roy Stilling, 14 September 1996

When Uganda became independent, Milton Obote became prime minister. Being from the small Langi tribe, he appointed King 'Freddy' Mutesa II, Kabaka of Buganda, as president of Uganda. As has been mentioned, the Baganda were the largest ethnic group and more anglicized (by contact with missionaries and the colonial authorities) than the other groups.

By appointing Mutesa, Obote miscalculated. He alienated other tribes and didn't actually succeed in placating the Baganda, who by May 1966 were openly agitating for Obote's overthrow.  Obote used the then deputy commander of the Army, one Idi Amin to do the dirty work. Amin personally attacked the Kabaka's palace with a 122 mm gun mounted on his (Amin's) personal jeep. The King escaped and fled to Britain were he died in (I think) the early 1970s. Later, of course, Idi Amin staged a coup against Obote. Ironically, this was initially welcomed by the Baganda (naturally, Amin blamed Obote for their persecution). 
Stuart Notholt, 15 September 1996 

 


The Buganda Kingdom history of flags:

The current flag of the Buganda kingdom comprises three equal vertical stripes of blue, white and blue, with the kingdom's logo placed in the centre of the flag on the white stripe:

1960-2018

 

The first known flag of RED during the history of Buganda 1861-1881

 

The next one is white and red during 1881-1889

 

The next one is white dark brown dark brown white and grey as outlined above. During 15 July 1891- 30 March 1892

 

This one is all dark brown with a logo in the middle during 1892.

 

The Buganda Royal Standard as the 19 Century approached.

 

 

 

 

 

 

‘Wallayi abantu ba Uganda baavu! Naye lwaki?’

 

Written by Yusuf Sserunkuma

 

A shopkeeper waiting in vain for customers in one of the many trading centers of Uganda.

 

When one moves through the suburbs of Kampala, there is construction everywhere entering into hitherto remote villages.

“Kampala is expanding,” the cliché goes. It looks like Ugandans are doing well. How else would they be able to do all this if they were broke? But often followed in whispers, is the question about the name of the owner.

“They are those people,” they say under their breath, before audibly adding, “who else has money except those ones?” Not to begrudge these equally poor compatriots of ours — only deluded by their temporal closeness to power — these housing constructions paint a wrong picture. Because the  wananchi are stinky broke.

Consider vehicle ownership: in his wandering political commentaries, former journalist Andrew Mwenda had gotten into the habit of using Kampala’s traffic jams as yardstick for measuring wealth. He actually disputed potholes and bad roads as the cause for traffic jams but, rather, rise in wealth under Museveni’s stewardship. He was so wrong, especially if you learn that all of Uganda has just two million vehicles — including taxis, tractors, lorries and buses This is out of more than 40 million people.  

If one added Kampala’s night-life — with many cheap parties happening from Monday to Sunday — one would be convinced to believe these Ugandans are living their lives. Never mind that on parties, naturally beautiful revellers donned in third-hand designer clothes are drowning themselves in Changa’a, Kill-Me-Quick, and other dangerous compounds marketed as high-end ales and liquors.

Ugandans are penurious to alarming levels. A casual sampling of Kampala alone is terrifying: On any of the highways exiting Kampala, you will find hordes of haggard and hungry hands trekking back on foot back to their dingy hideouts.

Many of these live as far as Gayaza, Maganjo, Matugga, Bweyogerere Mukono or Nabbingo depending on the route they take, and their work stations are in Kampala.  They cannot afford the Shs 4,000 (about $1) of the taxi fare to and from their homes. Because they earn about Shs 5,000 a day, oftentimes, nothing at all.

Many of these unlucky hands — by far the majority in downtown Kampala, Kisekka market, Ndeeba, Owino, Wandegeya, Mulago, Kampala’s arcades, Nakivubo, Kalerwe, Kasubi, etc.—are unable to buy themselves lunch during a workday. If they are lucky enough, katogo, normally a mixture of beans and cassava, or matoke and byenda, which goes at about Shs 3,000 in the cheapest places, will be a lucky day.

Instead, they eat Shs 500 buveera-packaged sugarcane and might drink Shs 200 buveera-water. This condition has not spared small-scale businesses, and retail shops wherever they exist. If they are in the products business, they have to compete with cheap Chinese products, with Indian and Chinese “investors” running retail supermarkets in upscale and low-scale neighbourhoods.

How did this happen? Workers in the farmers’ markets such as Nakasero, Kalerwe, Bwaise, Kasubi are barely surviving.

Even supposedly big businesses — from Roko Construction, Simba Telecom, Biyinzika, Freedom City Mall, Shumuk Aluminium Industries, Roofings Limited, Grapes Construction, Ham Enterprises, Senana Enterprises, Ssebagala and Sons, Club Silk, and many, many others — are either on life support or dead and buried. This is the national condition. No wonder why many seemingly thriving people are escaping into exile — claiming political persecution and sexual minorities! Because the condition at home is hopeless.

The small clique

True, there is that small group, which despite living in Uganda, forms a country of their own within Uganda. These ones have sold a largely deceptive image of a country.  These are mostly dealers with government in public service and public agencies. These are recipients of government tenders, and others form our top political cartel. 

They have jobs inside State House (spending Shs 2.5 billion daily), parliament (spending Shs 8 billion, daily), and then add LC Vs, IIIs.  Some are in the CSO and NGO cartels, or work for international cartels — all of which cushions them from the pains of the wananchi. Sadly, these constitute the criminals that have sold the country to international capital.

This small clique also includes folks in security services — and their associates — with billions of “classified expenditure.” Plus, the gold dealers, who allegedly beat coffee in national proceeds; add drug dealers, etc.  Put together for Kampala, these could count to about 200,000 people out of  the estimated two million Kampalans. 

This is quite a number to overwhelm Kampala roads with brand new vehicles every year. Sampled across the entire country, these could be about one million persons from an estimated 40 million. (There are some lucky honest folks, who make the exception to whatever I have described above). This one million group have created this terribly wrong picture of a country supposedly with happy people, while over 35 million people in the country are barely surviving.

Taxes, bills, interest rates

On the one hand, you have some of the most extortionist taxes and bills.  Consider electricity: A study by The Observer’s Jeff Mbanga showed that “Ugandans pay one of the highest power tariffs in sub-saharan Africa. Domestic consumers pay a tariff of Shs 518 per KwH, which is $0.19, far higher than the sub-saharan Africa average of $0.13.” 

Why is this? Because our government accepted to be bribed dismantling Uganda Electricity Board (UEB) to a string of foreign companies.

On taxes, no one knows who designs these extortionist taxes. It is as if government is at war with its people. But my suspicion is that IMF is endlessly — because of the debt trap trick —bullying our spineless chaps in Finance to levy more and more taxes. They have now proposed taxing Saccos, too because these are becoming worthy credit institutions! They cannot be Ugandan.

Indeed, we are reaping the fruits of what Prof. Ezra Suruma warned us against: that we will remain slaves, poor and hungry until we owned our financial institutions. A small group of foreign-owned lenders have bribed their monopoly of banking, and also smuggled their way into the Bank of Uganda Act 2002.

yusufkajura@gmail.com

The author is a political theorist based at Makerere University

NB

Obote created this sort of Uganda predicament now 62 years and counting.

After Dr Obote messed up the hopes of the sovereign indepence of Uganda, Idi Amin toppled him only to be returned back to Uganda!

Although the Doctor is dead, his spirits as many people of the UPC calibre preache, are demading his party to continue to govern this country. One cannot accept and believe in such political rhetoric. Many of the people being asked to apologise over Obote's transgression are now dead and buried.

They are with the dead doctor and their God in heaven. The living Uganda members in UPC political party are presently very wealthy and doing well in this current government and the African nation as this article specifies!

 

Many African adults these days reminiscent about Obote political ideology and his efforts to turn the country left or social communism as in Russia and China.

Or the kibbutz in Israel or the Ujamaa in Tanzania. All this during the 1960s was to make sure that the political party of the UPC liberated the poor Africans and could remain in state power for ever in this country.

Surely as it is true. Charity begins at home and many leadership in Africa, charity begins when one is rich and not at home but elsewhere. Let not the State of Buganda continue to involve itself in the national elections of Uganda which are never going to be free and fair!

 

 

 

 

Why is it that in Uganda, leading criminal impostors of State House, Uganda Revenue Authority and Security Agencies are of the tribe of Ankole in the Western Province of Uganda?

 
11 September, 2020
 
By World Media
 
The Ankole tribesmen on military parade
 
It is not in dispute that some unscruplous Ugandans have been and continue to extort money from unsuspecting victims through intimidation by claiming to be from State House, URA and security agencies. Citizens and foreigners residing in Uganda have fallen victim. The latest incident has been highlighted by an undercover investigation that was conducted by NBS Television  in July and dubbed THE MILK SHAKE. Video footage shows a group of young men plotting to fleece Pearl Diary who produce Lato Milk. They claimed to be from UNBS and accused the company of selling expired milk for which they demanded for a kickback of 800m shillings. The move was initiated by a worker in the same company who provided the information. In their plot, they use both English and Runyankole. The star actor is a one Solomon ABAHO. The Museveni law firm of Kiwanuka Kirwowa was at hand to facilitate the extortion. 
 
 
One of the accused from Western Uganda
 
Just early last month (August), another ABAHO who is an Army Captain from Museveni's elite SFC in the company of Wilberforce TURYAKIRA claiming to be officers from NEMA moved to extort money from a one Ester Ampumuza whom they accused of constructing her house in a wetland. In an effort to boost their strength, at a later stage they claimed to be officers from State House. The victim was lucky to be known to a certain military General who she called for her rescue before the two extorters were arrested.

In June 2020, Ronald MUHUMUZIBWA and Francis MUTAMBUZI opened a fake Facebook account in the names of the Commissioner General of URA which they used to extort money by falsely promising jobs and contracts in URA.

In February 2019, John Bo's KWESIGA who claimed to be an employee of State House falsely obtained money from victims in Mbarara on false promises that he was to help their children access the State House bursaries and scholarships. 

In February 2020, Caleb KANKIRIHO who claimed to be an employee of URA extorted Shillings 1m from a trader, a one Kasozi Fred, whom he found offloading his goods along Jinja Road after accusing the trader of tax evasion.

In July 2019, Daniel Rweishe KABANDIZE who claimed to be a State House Protocol Officer solicited for cash from a Swedish investor of BUTTER BAY company promising to fix an appointment for the Swedish investor with Museveni. KABANDIZE had already gotten $1,000 but was arrested when he was in the process of obtaining another $5,000. 

In February 2018, ISO's Apollo BYABAGYE and Carrol ARINDA forged an invitation letter purportedly from the Director General ISO to a Finish arms dealer who came to Kampala but met his death shortly after his arrival. They even went to the airport to receive their victim.

In November 2017, Ronald MUGISHA alias Henry RUGAMBWA, Edison OIKIRIZA alias MUSINGUZI claiming to be workers of Serena Hotel, falsely obtained money from their victim who they promised jobs at the same hotel. 

In April 2017, the then Minister of Labour and M.P for Rukiga County, Herbert KABAFUNZAKI and a one Brian MUGABO was arrested as he received a Shillings 5m bribe which was part of the 10m Shillings he had solicited from the proprietor of Aya Group. 

In November 2016, CMI's Capt. BARIGYE who was in charge of Rubaga Division robbed 24kgs of Gold worth 3.3b shillings from a Congolese gold dealer. 

In October 2016, Ambrose ATWIINE, Sam TUGUME from the Directorate of Citizenship and Immigration Control together with a one AHIMBISIBWE fraudulently sold work permits and passports including to sp,e Chinese from whom they turned around and demanded for a Shillings 3m bribe. 

In October 2016, Brig. KYANDA was on top of the Shillings 2b fake arms scandal involving a Polish arms dealer who was lured into signing fake contracts from the boardroom of the Army Headquarters at Bombo. 

In July 2016, Brig. Felix KULAIGYE and a one MURUNGI were involved in a shillings 300m Congolese gold scandal. 

In November 2014, Willy KAMUKAMA forged documents purportedly from State House that were sending him to National Water and Sewerage Corporation (NWSC) for a job. The head of NWSC Silver MUGISHA being another home boy, the fraud was repulsed. 

In 1999, Edison NABIMANYA who claimed to be an officer from CMI demanded for a Shillings 10m bribe from the Sri-Lankan MD of Dembe Group of Companies after NABIMANYA claimed to be investigating alleged fraud by the same company. 

Those are the few reported incidents and much more goes on but remains unreported. On November 27, 2018, the regime mouthpiece, New Vision, ran a wrong missive titled HOW THE MAFIA IS STEALING FROM CHINESE INVESTORS. New Vision detailed how a clique of well connected individuals were colluding with public officers, including judicial officers, to fleece foreign investors. <<They extort money from investors to arrange for them audience with Museveni, ask for money before allocating them free land, then pay kickbacks for granting the licensing process and tax holidays. In some instances they dupe their victims into illegal dealings with promises of protection from well connected officials but the same officers end up tipping their colleagues to extort from them>>. 

Therefore, for the Banyankole to dominate acts of extortion, fraud and blackmail, using URA, State House and the security agencies confirms the long held view that power is dominated by the Banyankole. If Bwambale a Mukonjo, Kirunda a Musoga , Opolot an Iteso, Ongom a Langi, or Andama from West Nile attempted any claim to be working with State House, URA or CMI/SFC or ISO to do such extortion, no one would believe because those state agencies are managed by the likes of Abaho, Mpeirwe, Mugisha, Muhoozi and the like. Ignore the comedian Bizonto Group at your own peril.

INFORMATION IS POWER AND THE PROBLEM OF UGANDA IS MUSEVENISM
 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uganda Opposition Protesters have attacked Minister Kamya in London:

By James Kabengwa 

 

16 September, 2019

Attacked. Ms Beti Kamya, the Minister for Kampala Affairs in the long serving government of President Museveni of Uganda,  addressing journalists in Kampala recently. FILE PHOTO 

 

Opposition activists in London have confronted a government minister in this video accusing her of siding with a repressive regime.

Ms Beti Kamya, the minister for Kampala Affairs, was also reportedly pushed to the ground before the London Met Police intervened.

A video footage making rounds since Saturday night shows protesters wearing red attire with anti-government placards hurling insults at Ms Kamya.
In a statement to Daily Monitor, the People Power spokesperson in United Kingdom (UK), Ms Atim Belinda, owned up the incident saying: “it was the right time against the right group. The vice president Edward Ssekandi and other officials were present.”

Ms Kamya was due to make remarks on the last day of UK-Uganda Trade and Investment convention that lasted two days from September 13.
Housing Finance sponsored the event that educated Ugandans in the diaspora on acquiring mortgages and how they could invest back home.
Provocative words such as ‘you are a thief…arrest her…free Stella Nyanzi…Museveni must go… get out here…they have killed our women…they have killed our people” can be heard directed to Ms Kamya, who is however, not seen in the video.

A few moments later, a Met Police van arrives with sirens and one man in red is seen on the ground being arrested by a police officer.
One of the participants in the protest yesterday said they will not give peace to Ugandan government officials who fly to Western capitals.
“They will get us here ready to tell them off. Once you are part of a repressive regime like Beti Kamya is..,” Mr Godfrey Ssekisonge, one of the protesters said.
Whereas some sources said Ms Kamya was pushed to the ground Ms Atim said: “You don’t rule that out. Everything happened so fast, very quickly.”

However, the deputy director of the Uganda Media Centre, Col Shaban Bantariza, yesterday described the confrontational behaviour as a waste of time.
“Power is not taken through insulting people. That is an improper method and nobody will support you. Those people are wasting time and are losing even the little credibility they would have,” Col Bantariza said by telephone yesterday.
Ms Kamya had not responded to our calls and messages by press time.

 

 

 

 

 

Male Mabiriizi awandiikidde Ochola omukuuku gw'ebbaluwa kumusango gwa President wa Uganda okweyongezanga ebiseera byayagala okufuga ensi Uganda:

By Musasi wa Bukedde

 

Added 8th May 2019

 

MUNNAMATEEKA Male Mabiriizi awandiikidde omuduumizi wa poliisi mu ggwanga omukuuku gw’ebbaluwa ng’amusaba amukakase nti poliisi egenda kumuwa obukuumi ku ye nebintubye mu kiseera ky’agenda okumala ng’atalaaga eggwanga okusonda sente ezinaamuyamba mu musango gwe yawaabye mu kkooti ya East Africa.

 

Mr Male Mabirizi ng'ali mu kkooti

 

Wiiki ewedde May 3, 2019 Mabiriizi yatutte omusango mu kkooti ya East African Kkooti Of Justice oguli ku nnamba 06/2019 ng’awakanya ensala ya kkooti ensukkulumu eyakakasa palamenti kye yakola okuggyawo ekkomo ku myaka gya pulezidenti.

 

Ebbaluwa yagiwandiise ku Mande n’ajjukiza poliisi nti okusinziira ku nnyingo 212(a) mu ssemateeka wa Uganda erambika obuvunaanyizibwa bwa Poliisi okukuuma omuntu n’ebintubye.

Ennyingo 29(1) (e) ewa abantu eddembe okukuba enkung’aana omuli n’ezookusonda sente ate 29(2) (a) emuwa eddembe okutambula mu buli kitundu kya Uganda nga takugiddwa muntu yenna.

 

Mu bbaluwa y'emu ategeeza nti ennyingo 43(2) (a) ne (c) erambika nti omuntu akola ekintu kyonna ku lw’obulungi bw’eggwanga talina kutulugunyizibwa lwa byabufuzi wadde okukugirwa okwenyimiriza mu ddembelye nga bwe lirambikibwa mu ggwanga eririna demokulasia.

“Okwesigama ku nsonga ezo waggulu nsaba ompe obukakafu nti nja kufuna obukuumi nze n’ebintu byange okuva mu kitongole ky’okulira” Mabiriizi bwe yaggumizza n’agamba nti asuubira okutalaaga munisipaali awamu ne Town Council  50 okwetoloola eggwanga.

Yategeezezza nti ebifo waagenda okukuba enkung’aana waakubitegeeza poliisi n’obudde bw’anabeerawo nga tannaba kusitula kugendayo era wekisoboka enkiiko waakuzikolera mu bisenge ebinene omukolerwa emikolo nga n’abantu okuyingira balina kumala kwewandiisa.

Ezimu ku nsonga Mabiriizi ze yawadde ng’awaaba yategeezezza nti:

  • Abantu baabulijjo bammibwa omukisa okwetabamu okukyusa ssemateeka.
  • Waaliwo okukozesa ekifuba n’okutyoboola eddembe ly’abantu ekyaleetera amagye ne poliisi okuyingira mu palamenti ne gakwata n’okusiba ababaka.
  • Okulemwa okugoberera amateeka n’emitendera palamenti gy’eyitamu okukyusa ssemateeka.
  • Sipiika Kadaga okuwolereza pulezidenti etteeka aliteekeko omukono nga lyawukanna kw’eryo ababaka lye baakubaganyaako ebirowoozo.

 

 

The Laywer in Uganda is taking the government to court for having arrested decent hard working civil servants who are suspect in corruption practice:

March 5, 2019

Written by URN

President Museveni with Lt Col Edith Nakalema, the head of State House Anti-Corruption Unit

The President of Uganda marching with Lt Col Edith Nakalema on his left side

 

A city lawyer attached to Sebalu and Lule Advocates, Nicholas Ecimu has sued the State House Anti-corruption unit for Shs 300m allegedly usurping the powers of the inspectorate of government (IG).

The respondents to the suit are Lt Col Edith Nakalema, the commandant of the State House Anti-corruption unit, the director of public prosecutions, attorney general, director criminal investigations department and the officer in charge of Kabalagala police station.     

The suit stems from the arrest of several Mbarara district local government officials. They include the chief administrative officer Felix Cuthbert Esoku, Godlive Ayebare and Emmanuel Himbisa, both senior land officers, Aggrey Atukwatse, the assistant engineer and human resource officer Rosalia Karuhanga. 

 

The officers were picked up by the State House Anti-corruption unit on February 22 on accusations of illegally receiving payment for various plots of land along Kamukuzi road in Mbarara municipality without authorisation from the Uganda Land Commission. 

The Anti-corruption unit acted on a complaint from a whistleblower implicating the officers. They were arraigned before the Anti-corruption court in Kampala on corruption related offences. It is also alleged that Esoku caused the leasing of Plot 5A on Galt road in Mbarara municipality to Rwampara member of parliament Charles Ngabirano, well knowing that the land didn’t belong to the Mbarara district local government. Relatedly, Karuhanga and others are said to have altered minutes of the council meeting held on May 24, 2018 with intentions to deceive. 

But now, Ecimu has petitioned the High court Civil Division through his lawyers Kanduho and Company Advocates to stay the investigations against the accused by Lt Col Nakalema and her unit, saying it infringes on their constitutional rights.

“The said Lt Col Nakelema is the accuser/complainant, the investigator, the arresting officer, as well as the incarcerator. She is a judge in her own case”, reads the petition in part.

Ecimu contends that the IG had commenced investigations against the suspects, which are still ongoing. He also argues that as public servants, the suspects are not accountable to the State House Anti-corruption unit but rather the inspectorate of government.

His application is supported by an affidavit. “It was obvious from the way the media was arranged and her interrogation techniques that she had planned before to go arrest my brother and his subordinate staff and embarrass them as much as possible without due regard to the law”, the affidavit reads. 

Ecimu wants court to order Nakalema to stop storming offices of suspects in a manner that disturbs their peace, quiet with orders and summons for investigations and arrests. Ecimu is now demanding Shs 300 million on behalf of the suspects for the violation of their rights, saying Nakalema had no powers to storm their offices and arrest them before handing them to court for prosecution.

The matter will come up for hearing before Justice Musa Sekaana on March 6. In December 2018, President Yoweri Museveni officially launched at the State House Anti-corruption unit to handle corruption complaints including extortion at roadblocks, bribery and nepotism and embezzlement of public funds.  

The unit has since arrested several officials suspected of corruption in different parts of the country including Jinja, Arua, Tororo and Wakiso district among others.

Nb

This is an educated African and partly English lawyer who is encouraging his white collar government workers not to accept being arrested and humiliated in an African village community as if they are chicken thieves. The African cultural perspective of a chicken thief is a much more disgraceful act than an educated government official committing fraud in his or her duty of serving the citizens of this country.  This lawyer might just win it under this NRM judiciary.

 

 

 

 

 

Museveni agumizza Bannayuganda ku bbeeyi y'amasannyalaze: 'Gagenda kukka mu bbanga eritali lyewala'

By Muwanga Kakooza

 

Added 17th October 2018 

 

Dow2uhx0ae83zh 703x422

 Pulezidenti wa Uganda ngali nabamuwa amagezi mu State House

 

PULEZIDENTI Museveni agumizza Bannayuganda naddala bannamakolero nti ebbeeyi y’amasannyalaze mu ggwanga eyolekedde okukka oluvannyuma lw’amabibiro agatali gamu agabadde gazimbibwa okumalirizibwa.

 

Museveni era asuubizza okugoba abakungu ba gavumenti bonna abagaanyi okugula ebintu ebikolebwa mu ggwanga ne badda mu kubiragiriza okuva ebweru ng’agamba nti bakosa ebyenfuna.

Bino Pulezidenti Museveni yabitegeezezza asisinkanye ekibiina ekigatta bannamakolero mu ggwanga ekya ‘Uganda Manufacturers Association’ abaakulembeddwa akikulira Barbra Mulwana. Baabadde mu maka g'Obwapulezidenti e Ntebe.

 

Pulezidenti yagambye nti oluvannyuma lw’okumaliriza okuzimba kw’ebibiro ly’amasannyalaze e Agago ebbeeyi eyolekedde okukka. N’agamba nti mu bbanga eritali ly’ewala Uganda ejja kuba ekola amasannyalaze mangi ekigenda okugassa ebbeeyi kiyambe n’okwanguyiza bannamakolero emirimu.

Mu nsisinkano bannamakolero baalopedde Pulezidenti Museveni nti abakungu ba gavumenti balagiriza ebintu okuva ebweru ne babigula buwanana sso nga bikolebwa ne  wano. Wano Museveni yasuubizza okubagoba.

Yagambye nti ebintu byonna ebiva ebweru  ng’eddagala bijja kussibwako emisolo kasita kinaazulibwa nti bisobola okukolerwa wano mu ggwanga.

Yagambye nti Bannayuganda okugula ebintu ebikolebwa wano kijja kuyamba bizinensi n’amakolero okukulaakulana n’agamba nti gavumenti efuba okulaba ng’eyanguyiza bannamakolero n’abasuubuzi enkola y’emirimu ng’eyita mu  kubaterawo amasanyalaze, okuzimba enguudo,leerwe,okutereeza entambula,okufuna looni,okubafunira amazzi.

Yagambye nti oluguudo lw’eggaali y’omukka okuva e  Mombasa okutuuka e Kisumu lunaatera okutongozebwa ng’ate ne Tanzania enaatera okukola olwayo oluva e Dar es Salaamu okutuuka e Mwanza n’agamba nti kino kigenda kwanguyinza Bannayuganda okutambuza ebyamaguzi.

Museveni yagambye nti musanyufu okulaba ng’ensimbi Uganda z’ekozesa okugula ebintu okuva ebweru zikendedde okuva ku buwumbi bwa ddoola musanvu ne zidda ku butaano.

Nb

Singa no Babra Mulwana ono atulagako paddy pads ne toilet paper bwezikolebwa mubuli ngeri zonna nebizikola wano mu Uganda ate nga nebbeyi buli muna Uganda afuluma mukiyigo agisobola. Kigya kuzamu abantu amanyi. Kiswaza okuwulira nti containers 5 eza toilet paper eziva e China bazisudde e Kiteezi kubisassiro kubanga omutindo gwazo mukyamu!

 

Ye mwe abamakolero lwaki mutya okuleeta ebyuma(factory assembly machinery) byamakolero mu ggwanga ebisobola okukola ebikozesebwa(nga essimu, TV, bus nebirala) ebyo mulembe.

 

 

 

 

 

In Uganda, the Vice President, Mr Edward Ssekandi is not serious in his job:

The leader of Japan (right) with the Vice President of Uganda on the left.

Mr Edward Sekandi in marriage as a young lawyer in Uganda

The tax-payer is not getting value for money for the high government expenditure that is constantly spent in this office:

7 September, 2018

Written by Yusuf Serunkuma

Mr Yusuf Serunkuma

 

 

An elderly friend of mine who saw Vice President Edward Ssekandi in his heydays as a young advocate tells me he was a handsome and cheerful counsel.

Time and trouble have taken their toll on the former speaker. But he was dandy and well-kempt. In 1973, as a fresh graduate lawyer from Tanzania, Ssekandi amorously fell in love with a belle that lived in the Bukoto flats. This affair brought out the best in him.

His car, a white Fiat 124, would be seen in the parking lot at this urban estate. Later, you would catch the top city lawyer patronising the hitherto White/Indian-only clubs and ale houses.

He surely indulged his girl. His fashion was creative as his taste was exquisite. If he were not driving to Kampala club, you were sure to find him at the National theatre or one of those debonair restaurants.

True to a lawyer’s hustle, Ssekandi doubled as an advocate and academic – teaching at Law Development Centre (LDC), which he also headed for a year.

On Kampala road, where Nando’s restaurant stands, was the former Indian-owned building that housed Ssekandi’s swanky chambers. His clients recall an eloquent and indefatigable advocate – a bit slow but thorough to the bone.

As VP, however, Ugandans have come to see Ssekandi as some sort of a clown.  Like the character, Feste in Shakespeare’s comedy drama, Twelfth Night, for his loud silence and rather clownish personae, Ssekandi has been thought an idiot.

Feste had stayed in the household of Countess Olivia for long and the lady took much delight in him. Although he had become too old for a servant, “he still has the wit to carry off good ‘fooling’ when he needs to, and the voice to sing lustily or plan gently as the occasion demands.” Seeing Ssekandi as some form of Feste is most tempting.

Look, of all Museveni’s vice presidents, Ssekandi is the most wordless.  Despite all Museveni’s VPs being simply mouth and trousers, Ssekandi’s predecessors actually gave the job a performance that disguised their powerlessness.

Dr Samson Kisekka was as loud and pompous as he could get – bragging about the six degrees in his bedroom! Dr Specioza Kazibwe – perhaps the noisiest of them all – actually had a show on national radio where her unscripted ramblings were broadcast every Sunday.

And Prof Mahogany gave the listening and viewing audience much delight. VP Ssekandi is the diametric opposite of all his predecessors. He grants neither long nor short media interviews. He comments on nothing.

The VP position being one charged with everything (and directly responsible for nothing in effect), Ssekandi is quick to refer nosy journalists to the relevant ministries. He is not shy to feign or actually acknowledge ignorance of things – even as commonplace as Bobi Wine and the Arua violence. But believe you me fellow countrymen, this man is no fool.

There are two ways of reading Ssekandi’s choice to become the most silent senior politician in Uganda’s history. First is his profession as a lawyer. It is common knowledge that our ‘learned friends’ never enter politics on the ground of some lofty ideals such as democracy or Marxist truisms.

But power, money and fame.  In fact, lawyers see politics as an extension of their profession. As Marx observed, they earn their livelihood by crafting the interests of merchants into law – however grievous these laws could be to their compatriots. We could say that Ssekandi entered politics as a continuity of his hustle.  But that is a small part.

The second reading, which I find more persuasive, is that Ssekandi fully appreciates the nature of our politics and the dilemma of speech in Museveni’s Uganda: to defend the regime is to lose your head and be branded a Feste.

Yet to keep your head and speak your mind is to lose your place and be branded a rebel. The NRM has plenty of Festes, and equal number of rebels – many with broken bones and hearts, and others terribly bankrupted.

With his resume of a seasoned Kampala advocate, and former speaker of parliament, surely Ssekandi has seen and knows enough than many Ugandans. In fact, his genius is in understanding the time, and choosing to be a silent clown.

The author is a PhD fellow at Makerere Institute of Social Research.

 

 

 

 

 

The Republic of Uganda has made a Parliamentary decision to get on with trying to enthrone the President of Uganda as an African Emperor:

The long serving African President of Uganda, Mr Yoweri Museveni.

December 20, 2017

By the Observer newspaper, Uganda.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Written by Mr Ssemujju Ibrahim Nganda.

 

 

Our country has so far paid nearly Shs 100 billion to promoters of the removal of the presidential age limit from the Constitution to allow Gen Yoweri Museveni seek reelection in 2021.

Members of Parliament from Gen Museveni’s ruling NRM alone have pocketed more than Shs 40 billion so far.

He first authorized parliament to give each MP Shs 29 million for consultation on whether age limits should be removed or not. I am talking about Article 102(b) of the Constitution which stops a 75-year-old person from contesting for president.

The total amount spent on fake consultations by MPs was over Shs 12 billion. The NRM MPs then initially demanded Shs 800 million each because passing the amendment was going to make many of them extremely unpopular.

The money asked was too much and, after negotiations, it came down to Shs 200 million each. But I think because there are many people offering support in order to get money, eventually each MP has been given Shs 40 million.

This is what they have been picking from a building near Housing Finance Bank in Kololo. A female bodyguard to Museveni was the one distributing it. She spent two days at Kololo. An NRM MP told me of a room full of money stuffed in (budeeya) sisal-made bags.

Each MP given money was made to sign in a book. Some opposition MPs also pocketed this money. Theirs was delivered through agents.

We are 451 MPs in parliament, which means at least Shs 20 billion was spent on them. The NRM MPs who sit on the Legal and Parliamentary Affairs committee were each given Shs 300 million to sign the report on this bill.

This amounts to Shs 6 billion. In total, therefore, more than Shs 40 billion has been spent on bribing MPs. You remember the money Museveni gave out to the NRM Central Executive Committee (CEC) members to popularize the satanic proposals?

Police and the military are on high alert nearly every day waiting to pounce on the protesting population. I think when you add all this, the total cost comes to over Shs 100 billion.

That is on the monetary side. There is another huge cost that awaits our country. Here I am not talking about the possibility of a rebellion or violence about being ruled by a vulnerable person.

I think Museveni has made too many mistakes that have eroded his clout as a leader. And sinning in public has left him extremely vulnerable. The push to remove age limits has exposed him more than the removal of term limits did.

It is the reason NRM MPs can publicly ask him for “logistics” and he delivers. The classic case of this vulnerability played out on Monday morning during a cabinet meeting at the prime minister’s office near Parliament.

Museveni drove in at about 9am to chair a cabinet meeting called specifically to discuss the extension of a term of office from five to seven years. Museveni told his cabinet that since the mandate that the population gave us was five years, extending the term of the current Parliament would bring a backlash.

Gen Moses Ali told Museveni that during the same election, the population elected a president for the final term, since he would be more than 75 years old come the next election.

“But we are now changing it,” he said.

Moses Ali, himself an old man of about 84, told Museveni that since “we are giving you something, let us also take something.”

But what moved Museveni most was the revelation that if he stops MPs from extending their term by two years, they will automatically sabotage his push for the removal of the age limit.

If that is the case, a senior minister told me, Museveni said go ahead and give yourself two years.That is how much we have degenerated. I am told Rebecca Kadaga was initially opposed to this legal gerrymandering but she eventually gave in.

For me, that is the great risk that we face as a country. In Tanzania, the new leader has been saying no to many things including unnecessary travels by MPs. He is able to reign in on his ministers. Ours has been overcome by so many personal mistakes in his insatiable appetite for power.

That is why I am not talking about smaller things like our suspension from Parliament. [Ssemujju and five others were suspended on Monday by the speaker for improper conduct] Of course we were suspended illegally but that is no cost to the country.

The real cost is on Uganda being ruled by a vulnerable person unable to contain his human resource. The vulnerability is increasing by the age.

Nb

Indeed it is a very clear ambition for His Excellency, the Great President of the Republic of Uganda to become an African Emperor. Just like the late Equatorial African military dictator General Jean Bendel Bokassa. Bokassa did not impose himself to his people as Emperor. His great political party did decide for him in the Central Republic of Chad!

 

 

 

 

In the Democratic Parliament of Uganda Ministers’ absence cripples House business as Nankabirwa angers MPs

The Democratic Parliament of Uganda in session

 

 

By Solomon Arinaitwe

Government Chief Whip Ruth Nankabirwa has a fondness for “begging for the indulgence” of the House over matters.
Often, when an MP raises a matter requiring a response from either the line minister or Prime Minister and they are absent, Ms Nankabirwa will leap to the floor and hazard a response, rarely convincing the inquisitor.

The matter of minister’s absence has been fodder for these pages since the opening of the 10th Parliament, but it seems pleas by the Speaker and MPs continuously fall on deaf ears as the front-bench continues to be a pale shadow of one or two ministers.

When questions are posed and there is no minister to respond, the Government Chief Whip, who cleverly sits just near the Speaker’s seat, will quickly dash to the microphone, and “beg the indulgence of the House”. The reasons she gives for ministers not being on duty in Parliament are varied.

On Wednesday, Ms Nankabirwa was at it again. Adjumani Woman MP Jesca Ababiku raised the issue of unreliable power supply to her district which required a response from the Energy ministry. But there was no minister from Energy which hosts three ministers.

Ms Nankabirwa shot up and made her customary comment of having “taken note” of the concerns of the House and how she would “work very closely with the minister of Energy to ensure that the people of Adjumani are served.”

Next up was the Tororo Municipality MP Yeri Ofwono who complained of a businessman in Tororo who has defrauded locals in Tororo and fled.

“My prayer is that the minister of Internal Affairs and the minister of Foreign Affairs bring this man to answer for the charges,” Mr Ofwono said, hoping against all hope that at least two ministers from departments that host five ministers would be at hand to offer relief to troubled, defrauded locals. Again, the ministers were nowhere to be seen.

This time Ms Nankabirwa did not even allow the distraught MP to complete his narration as she shot up and told Mr Ofwono to have his distressed constituents record statements with the police and “we will swing in action”.

“In the modern world, there is no place for criminals to hide. There are systems and so let us engage those systems to help the people who have lost their things,” Deputy Speaker Jacob Oulanyah said, just to assure the disbelieving MP that the government could somehow do something about the plight of his constituents.

Mbale Municipality also raised the matter of the rampaging robberies and kidnappings in the town, but again Internal Affairs minister Gen Jeje Odongo was not available to respond.

Ms Nankabirwa this time “congratulated Wamai” for the way he handled his run-in with suspected criminals and put him on notice to always call police when he bumps into suspicious characters and then went into a speech about “how police has tried”. She promised to communicate to the Internal Affairs minister.

Then the controversial issue of St Balikuddembe Market (Owino), where vendors are living on the edge following the expiry of a deadline to clear an outstanding loan of Shs4.8 billion to dfcu Bank.

The agitated vendors face the risk of losing the three-acre land, which dfcu bank is threatening to auction if an outstanding loan is not cleared.

Mukono Municipality MP Betty Nambooze wanted either the minister for Kampala Capital City Authority Beti Kamya or the State minister Benny Namugwanya to give an update on the status of the transaction between the vendors and dfcu bank. The two ministers were nowhere to be seen.

Ms Nankabirwa was again quick to jump to the fray. She said the obvious, that the “government is aware of this case” that “touches a lot of people” and that she would contact the President to get a response about the petition to bail out the vendors.

As it was getting too far, acting Leader of Opposition Roland Kaginda (Rukungiri Municipality) raised a point of order and warned that ministers had absconded from duty and abandoned their work to Ms Nankabirwa.

“We have 80 ministers. Is it in order for the Chief Whip to answer all the questions raised by members? It is continuous for the Chief Whip to answer questions [meant for ministers] and we are not getting answers,” Mr Kaginda asked. The Deputy Speaker ruled that the Government Chief Whip could be on Cabinet assignment.

Dokolo Woman MP Cecilia Ogwal proposed that the matter of the role of the Government Chief Whip (GCW) and how she takes on work meant for ministers be discussed by the Parliament Commission, arguing that she had jumbled roles that are confusing the House and her colleagues.

“The GCW should concentrate and focus on whipping the backbenchers and she should leave the whipping of the front-bench to the Executive. I think it is important that we go back to the true role of the Chief Whip.

She is being over-loaded. She is whipping the Executive and the backbench. We do not where she belongs. She is messing us up, “Ms Ogwal said.

“The role of the Chief Whip is to whip the party [members] and not the ministers. If you are doing the work properly, then you should be appointed the prime minister. Last time, I told you that Nankabirwa should be appointed prime minister and then she can use her expertise properly,” Mr Hassan Kaps Fungaroo (Obongi County) said.

At some point, Ms Nankabirwa took up the role of laying ministerial policy statements, a preserve of line ministers, much to the disappointment of Nwoya County MP Simon Oyet who warned the House was evolving into a “village meeting” because rules were being openly violated.

But the Leader of Government Business must devise means of ensuring that ministers attend Parliament as demanded by the rules or critical time that would otherwise be devoted to handling House business will be wasted in eternal bickering.

On Wednesday, plenary time was wasted for close to half an hour as MPs bickered over whether to proceed in the absence of ministers. It is about time Prime Minister Rugunda tackled the scourge of absentee ministers.

The rules

The matter of ministers attending Parliament business is well spelt out in the rules.

Rule 103(1) indicates that for any ministry, the minister or at least the minister of State shall attend sittings of the House; and where none of them is able to attend, a minister shall request another minister to represent that ministry’s interests in the House and notify the Speaker accordingly.

Prime Minister and Leader of Government Business Ruhakana Rugunda is charged with ensuring that Rule 103(1) is adhered to.

Rule 35(1a) requires ministers to attend the House to answer questions.

Rule 14 prescribes the roles of the Government Chef Whip which are largely restricted under sub-rule(2) which indicates that the CGW is to ensure due attendance, participation in proceedings and voting in Parliament of members of the ruling party.

AN INTERESTING LETTER TO PRESIDENT MUSEVENI ON INTRIGUE AT THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE IN UGANDA

  • Written by DR MAXWELL ADEA

Dear President Museveni, I greet you.

As I write this letter, I reflect on the words of Martin Luther King Jr: “The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy.”

Your Excellency, my first close interaction with you was in 2006 at the Russell Square at a public debate in London. When I stood up then and made a contribution in support of your counsel and developmental ideas of having a transformed Uganda and East African Community, I caught your eye. You applauded my contribution and urged Ugandans in the diaspora to emulate my good example.

This led to my subsequent employment in Uganda, first as a senior consultant and advisor to the minister for microfinance. Your Excellency, I gave selfless and honest service to my beloved country for the most needed economic transformation which culminated in rapid growth of microfinance institutions and savings and credit cooperative societies (Saccos) in Uganda.

I worked in this position for four years and seven months but I was paid for one year, leaving a balance of 43 unpaid months’ salary to date. I brought this to your attention, and in a May 23, 2013 letter, you directed the ministry of finance to pay all my outstanding arrears. Mr President, this has never happened.

A vacancy arose in the ministry of finance for position of commissioner, finance and planning in 2012. I applied, sat an interview, passed, and got an appointment letter from the public service permanent secretary on December 2, 2012.

I took office on March 1, 2013. In this position, my salary started coming without any consideration being made on the unpaid salary arrears. As a commissioner, I worked with a dedicated team and within a short period, we were able to achieve many things such as the Tier 4 Microfinance Bill, which gained approval from cabinet and later parliament and the president.

I also authored, with the support of the line minister, Caroline Okao, the concept of financial inclusion for rural areas. I presented this concept and later proposal to various forums. This gained approval from the president of the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) in Rome with huge financial support to the financial sector in Uganda.

I served as commissioner microfinance department from March 1, 2013 until February 25, 2014 when I was arrested from my office in the ministry of finance, Kampala.

My arrest came soon after I had come back from Rome, Italy, where I went to defend the Project for Financial Inclusion for Rural Areas in Uganda (Profira) before the president of IFAD. This meeting was successful and IFAD approved funding for a seven-year project for financial inclusion for rural areas in Uganda.

I never stayed in office to implement and see the progress of the project I initiated. Mr President, my heart bleeds for unfairness, malicious actions and intrigue against me that led to the dubious charges of human trafficking followed by arbitrary arrest and unwarranted incarceration.

Mr President, I have written several letters to you seeking audience but I have not heard from you. I suspect you did not get my letters. On February 25, 2014, I was arrested from office without being summoned to police and I was given the summons as I was being driven to Kireka Special Investigations Division (SID).

The summons mentioned that I should report to Kireka SID on February 26, 2014 at 2pm without fail. When I asked the arresting officer why they arrested me at 2pm of February 25, 2014, and yet I am supposed to report on February 26, 2014 at 2pm, he told me that I worked where there is a lot of money; so, I should give him money to save me.

I got confused and I told him that I was a civil servant and I did not have such money to give him. The officer told me that a sheep only realizes danger when it is about to die. To cut the story short, I was granted bail from the War Crimes court at Kololo on December 8, 2015 (almost two years under unlawful incarceration on remand) and I consistently report to the same court.

The damages caused to me as a result of this detention and unlawful incarceration were enormous:

Twenty of my relatives were arrested and arbitrarily detained. Psychological torture to my family, in-laws and friends globally. My shop in Kampala was devastated.

My cows, sheep, goats, ducks, chicken, fish and beehives were looted from my farm due to my incarceration at Luzira. My children and dependants are not in school.

Mr President, I know that you are a man of peace and faith who attempts to put his Christian principles and values into practice in public life. I, therefore, appeal for the following, Mr President: intervene and these criminal charges are removed from me. My salary arrears from the ministry of finance should be paid so that I may restock my farm.

As a Christian, I have forgiven all those who planned and implemented my arrest and subsequent psychological, material, financial and social losses I incurred in all these.

And I do not need any compensation whatsoever from the government of Uganda and the persons who did this to me, if only my people and my mind can be freed of this case.

drmaxwelladea@yahoo.com

The author is a former commissioner for microfinance at the ministry of finance, planning and economic development.

 

There is chaos in Kampala as Political opposition leaders are erratically arrested over fundraising to privately open the famous Educational University of Makerere:

FRIDAY DECEMBER 2, 2016

 

 

Kawempe North Councillor Muhammad Ssegirinya was arrested at Makerere university and detained at Wandegeya Police Station over FDC planned fundraising to open the university.

PHOTO BY DAMALI MUKHAYE 

By Damali Mukhaye

Several Opposition leaders have been arrested moments after former presidential candidate Dr Kizza Besigye was blocked from leaving his home ahead of a planned fundraising ceremony for Makerere university lecturers Shs28 billion allowance.

Those arrested include, FDC secretary for mobilization Ingrid Tutinawe, Makerere University councillor Doreen Nyanjura, Kawempe South Member of Parliament and opposition firebrand Mubarak Munyagwa and Kawempe North Councillor Muhammad Ssegirinya, among others.

They were arrested and taken to Wandegeya Police station.
By the time of filing this story, at least seven Makerere university students including GRC School of education Simon Wanyera and a one Harris Justus Amampulira had also been arrested.
According to the O/C Makerere University Police, Mr Denis Kasibante, only people working in the university banks, construction sites, church and Infectious Diseases Institute were allowed in the premises after presenting work IDs.

“National IDs are not allowed. Only work IDs are allowed,” said Mr Kasibante amid tight security at the university main gate.
The head of security at Makerere University, Mr Jackson Muchuguzi, said the university was closed and therefore no one is allowed to enter or conduct any business from the premises.
“If Besigye and other leaders want to fundraise, let them do it like the Katikkiro of Buganda Charles Peter Mayiga,” said Mr Muchuguzi.

Their arrest comes barely a day after police warned the Opposition Forum for Democratic Change (FDC) party against their planned fundraising campaign to open Makerere University scheduled for today at the university.

 

There is more real Chaos in the city of Kampala as taxi drivers go on strike:

THURSDAY DECEMBER 1 2016

Passengers were left stranded, loitering around looking for other means of transport.

PHOTO BY LEILAH NALUBEGA

UGANDA, Kampala: 

A strike by taxi drivers and vendors in Usafi Taxi Park yesterday disrupted public transport and brought business to a standstill.
The drivers were protesting against their colleagues who they say have illegally continued to operate on streets even after Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA) banned 50 taxi stages in a move that was aimed at curbing congestion in the city.
The alleged illegal stages include, Clock Tower, Mini-Price, City Square, Mutasa Kafeero, Mega standard and Bank of Uganda, among others.

At about 7am, all main gates to Usafi park were closed, blocking any taxi trying to move in or out with passengers.
Those taxi drivers who had refused to engage in the strike were forcibly removed from their vehicles.
Traders at the park joined in the strike, closing their shops. Business in the adjacent Usafu Market was also paralysed.
The traders also complained that the shortage of passengers at the taxi park is hindering their business.
Taxi operators from Usafi park then proceeded to Ben Kiwanuka Street and Shoprite Supermarket on Entebbe Road, and forced out passengers who had boarded taxis in stages in the two locations.

 

City streets are blocked up against moving traffic in the city. Any one who goes to the city does so at his or her own risk.

 

 

Passengers were left stranded, loitering around looking for other means of transport.
“All we have are false promises from the minister of Kampala that our issues will be solved but there is nothing they have done,” shouted Mr Othman Kasasa, a taxi driver.
Kampala minister Beti Kamya yesterday told Daily Monitor in a telephone interview that the Usafi taxi operators have a valid point since they complied with the KCCA directive. She, however, called for calm saying the issue would be resolved.
The taxi drivers and traders asserted that they had hopes of making good money this festive season but their hopes have been shattered by the unclear responses from the authority.

The business shops in the international city are closed up.

 

The striking drivers and taxi conductors tried to block Entebbe road stones and sticks to stop movement of taxis but police blocked their attempts, arresting some

 

Mr Deogratias Mbabazi, the personal assistant to the Lord Mayor, said: “We have had several consultative meetings over Usafi issues and a select committee was established to do more investigations on the increasing concerns, because there is a lot of politicking here. Whatever was said is not implemented.”
The striking drivers and taxi conductors tried to block Entebbe road stones and sticks to stop movement of taxis but police blocked their attempts, arresting some.
Early this month, Ms Kamya held a meeting with the Usafi vendors who complained of shortage of customers, attributing it partly to street vendors. She assured them their complaints would be resolved within two weeks.

editorial@ug.nationmedia.com

 

 

 

The Exiled King of Rwanda will be buried temporary in the United States of America:

 

His Majesty's body can then be returned to Rwanda at a future date," reads part of the statement.

 

This is the last King of Rwanda 1959-1970s, before his Ancient African Kingdom of Rwanda became a modern African Republic of Rwanda. This King has been living in Exile for the last 37 years of his life.

The last king of Rwanda Jean-Baptiste Ndahindurwa, popularly known as King Kigeli V is to be buried in United States of America. The body of the king, who died about a month ago, has been in California as the family members had failed to agree on the burial arrangements.

In a statement released by his official website, an alternative burial site has been found that is both appropriate and a holy resting place for an anointed king who was deeply devout to the Roman Catholic faith.  "His Majesty's body can then be returned to Rwanda at a future date," reads part of the statement.

His website reference is:  http://king-kigeli.org

"His Majesty's senior advisers are concerned that His Majesty's body would not be treated with respect and dignity once returned to Rwanda at this time.  Given that His Majesty's historic personal residence in Rwanda was allowed to be sold, demolished, and then made into a parking lot in 2013, little confidence exists that His Majesty's body would be treated as the former reigning head of state that he was".

His family members and relatives living in Rwanda held a meeting in Kigali on October 19 and agreed that funeral be held in Rwanda. However, those living in United States argued that the last monarch be laid to rest in America.

Kigeli's spokesperson recently Bonniface Benzige, while speaking to Voice of America, said he will not let the king be buried in Rwanda.

Nb

Indeed the African leadership in Rwanda cannot give up their hard earned political power in a Republic for a return to a traditional Kingdom.

The USA Presidential candidate, Mrs Clinton has changed colour and now promising to tackle 'systematic racism' that is entrenched well in that country.

John Wight has written for newspapers and websites across the world, including the Independent, Morning Star, Huffington Post, Counterpunch, London Progressive Journal, and Foreign Policy Journal. He is also a regular commentator on RT and BBC Radio. He wrote a memoir of the five years he spent in Hollywood, where he worked in the movie industry prior to becoming a full time activist and organizer with the US antiwar movement post-9/11. The book is titled Dreams That Die and is published by Zero Books. John is currently working on a book exploring the role of the West in the Arab Spring. You can follow him on Twitter @JohnWight1

Published time: 15 Apr, 2016 15:45Edited time: 15 Apr, 2016 16:22

As the campaign for the Democratic nomination for the White House heats up, former US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, is engaged in a shameless attempt to reinvent herself as a champion of racial justice and the country’s poor.

TrendsUS Elections 2016

Her latest demarche came with the speech she delivered at the annual convention of the National Action Network in New York recently, in advance of the latest primary election for the Democratic Party nomination. Clinton is up against Vermont senator and Democratic socialist, Bernie Sanders, who with his focus on the role of Wall Street and the power of the corporations in the nation’s crippling inequality has been pushing the former US secretary of state all the way.

In her address to the convention of black activists and justice campaigners of the National Action Network, led by Reverend Al Sharpton, Clinton railed against the “systemic racism” that exists within the United States, pledging to introduce legislation to reform the police and the country’s criminal justice system, two areas she identified as a problem in this respect.

Amnesty International has put the issue into context: “1 in 3 black men in the United States will go to prison or jail if current trends continue. An average of five million people is under state or federal supervision in the form of probation or parole.”

Amnesty also reveals: “The UN Human Rights Committee, which monitors states’ compliance with their obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, has expressed ongoing concern about racial disparities at different stages in the US criminal justice system, including sentencing disparities and the overrepresentation of individuals belonging to racial and ethnic minorities in prisons and jails. These issues point to the failure of the United States’ to respect, protect and fulfill its obligations in regard to the rights to be free from discrimination, to liberty and security of the person, to be equal before the law and to equal protection of the law.”

And lest anyone be in any doubt as to Hillary Clinton’s support for her husband’s 1994 crime bill, she campaigned for it as First Lady, saying back then: “We will finally be able to say, loudly and clearly, that three strikes and you're out. We are tired of putting you back in through the revolving door."

Now, in 2016, here she is, reaching out for the all-important black vote in this her second bid for the Democratic Party presidential nomination. Given the enormity of this issue, however, the role of the mass incarceration of young black men in destroying so many lives, families, and communities, there is no apology that could possibly come close to compensating those affected.

One of Hillary Clinton’s most vociferous critics is the black academic and human rights activist, Cornel West. “People know the symbolic language of Hillary Clinton,” he said in an interview in February. “But on the ground she is calling black youth super predators in the 1990’s. That is the most meaning degrading language to our precious young folk who sometimes do the wrong thing. We know they have gangsters on Wall Street. How many Wall Street executives go to jail? She is their hero. She is too tied to Wall Street with all that big Wall Street money flowing her way brother.”

Cornel West has also had a few choice words to say about the Reverend Al Sharpton in recent times, referring to the black community leader as, “Obama’s bonafide House Negro,” back in 2013.

In claiming the mantle of champion of racial justice while being a leading force in the introduction of mass incarceration, in presenting herself as a champion of the poor and marginalized while being a major recipient of corporate campaign funds and a champion of Wall Street, Hillary Clinton is engaged in one of the most cynical political campaigns ever waged. And this is without addressing her record on foreign policy.

One group of black voters the former secretary of state has definitely failed to win over are those involved in grassroots campaign group Black Lives Matter, which emerged in response to the increasing regularity of police killings and violence towards black people. During a recent Clinton campaign event, activists from the group staged an intervention. One of them shouted, “She’s killing us!”

Ssaabanyala Kimeze, Kabaka we Bugerere M7 gweyatondawo mu Republic ya Uganda, agobye nnyina mu nju:

Bya  Musasi wa Bukedde

 

Added 16th April 2016

 

SSAABANYALA Maj. Baker Kimeze agobye maama we Nnamwandu Aidah Nabanjala mu makaage n’asenga mu kifulukwa ku kyalo Mafumbe.

                                Ssabanyala Capt. Baker Kimeze.

                  Mu katono ye nnyina Nnamwandu Aidah Nabanjala

 

 

SSAABANYALA Maj. Baker Kimeze agobye maama we Nnamwandu Aidah Nabanjala mu makaage n’asenga mu kifulukwa ku kyalo Mafumbe.

Aidah Nabanjala eyagobeddwa ye Nnamwandu wa Nathan Mpagi Ssaabanyala omuberyeberye era kitaawe wa Maj. Kimeze.

Nabanjala agamba nti, “Kimeze yassa abajaasi abaamuweebwa Gavumenti ku kifuba mu maka gange mu kifo ky’okubatwala gy’asula.

Abajaasi bandiisa akakanja ate abamu yabalagira basule mu kisenge kyange mwe nasulanga ne baze.

Kimeze yahhaana okulima era ennimiro zonna yazingobamu n’alagira abaserikale okunkwata singa nninnya mu nnimiro omuli emmere gye nneerimira.

Kimeze azze anneewerera okunkuba singa siva mu maka gange era ku mulundi ogusembayo bwe yansonzeemu emmundu ne ngaddukamu.

 

 

                          Amaka maama wa Kimeze mw’abudamye.

 

 

Nsaba Pulezidenti Museveni annyambe kubanga Kimeze embeera ey’okutulugunya gy’aleese mu famire enkeese”, Nnamwandu bw’agamba.

Kigambibwa nti ne bato ba Kimeze okuli Daphin Mpagi ne Mukisa Rachael bwe baabadde bagenze mu maka gano abaserikale baabakubye emiggo ne baloopa ku poliisi e Kitimbwa omusango oguli ku fayiro SD:11/09/04/16.

Muganda wa Kimeze omulala Joshua Mpagi yagambye nti, “Twagala Gavumenti etutangaaze ku buyinza bwa Kizeme oba yabumuwa kujooga famire.”

Katikkiro wa Ssaabanyala Martin Ssenkaatuuka bino byonna yabisambazze nti bya bulimba famire ebyogera kunafuya kitiibwa kya Ssaabanyala olw’enjawukana mu famire.

Agamba nti Nnamwandu tagobwanga mu maka gano ate ennyumba Ssaabanyala teyagirekera bajaasi bokka wabula ekozesebwa nga ofiisi.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It seems in Uganda there is a change in the NRM government system. The NRM Judiciary has ruled that Police officers must now answer for abuses as individuals:

A Political activist in Uganda being chased off

by a policeman.

 

By  EPHRAIM KASOZI


Posted  Tuesday, October 13  2015 

  

Kampala, UGANDA:

Police officers and other state agents implicated in violation of human rights of suspects will be held liable as individuals and not as institutions, the Constitutional Court ordered yesterday. 

A panel of five Judges led by Justice Augustine Nshimye also directed the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) and the Inspector General of Police (IGP) to investigate a case in which a couple based in Mbarara is accusing two officers of the disbanded Rapid Response Unit (RRU) of alleged torture, seizure of property and money worth millions of shillings.

The other justices are Eldad Mwangusya, Richard Buteera, Prof Lillian Tibatemwa and Fredrick Egonda – Ntende.

“…the time has come for legal practitioners to consider in cases of this nature adding as parties the perpetrators, and their supervisors of challenged actions in their personal capacity so that they can face civil consequences for their willful disregard of the fundamental rights and freedoms of the people of this country,” court held in a unanimous decision.

The court decision resulted from a 2010 petition in which Mr Domaro Behangana and his wife Ms Mangadalen Behangana Birungi sued the Attorney General (AG), arguing that police officers led by Mr Jimmy Okiror who headed the defunct RRU in Mbarara and a one Milton Gumisiriza.

The duo is accused of beating the couple using batoons that caused them bodily harm and trauma as well as seizing their property and money.

Misconduct cited
Court held yesterday that the case reveals significant misconduct of law enforcement officers who ought to be prosecuted in accordance with the Police Act.

“In order to address impunity, we direct the Registrar of this court to serve copies of this judgment upon the DPP and IGP with a directive that they investigate this matter and report to this court not later than six months from the date of this judgment, the results of their investigations and the actions that they have taken against the errant officers,” court held.
The court dismissed a preliminary

ekasozi@ug.nationmedia.com

 

 

 

 

 

In Uganda, there has been another raid on The Courts of Law in the city of Kampala 

Chief Justice Bart Katureebe addresses journalists at his office in Kampala yesterday.

Photo by Michael Kakumirizi

The Inspector General of the Uganda Military Police Force,  Kale Kayihura has paid up his supporters and they are threatening to lynch prosecution lawyers outside the Courts of Law. Photo: @micoh

12 August, 2016

 

By Anthony Wesaka

UGANDA, KAMPALA:

The new NRM appointed Chief Justice Bart Katureebe has condemned the raid on Makindye Chief Magistrate’s Court by a rowdy mob supporting Gen Kale Kayihura, which frustrated the scheduled hearing of the police chief’s criminal case. 
“What happened yesterday (Wednesday) is unacceptable and it must not happen again,” Justice Katureebe said. 
“It strikes at the core of what the Constitution is all about; re-establishing the rule of law in this country,” he told journalists at his chambers in Kampala yesterday.

The Chief Justice said the Judiciary is the third arm of government and adjudicates cases between citizens and government, and other agencies.

“Let the institutions work. It’s really wrong for people to go and mobilise mobs to come and prevent us from doing our work; to come and frighten us from doing our work, and whoever is promoting them is really doing a disservice to the country.”

Gen Kayihura was expected to appear in Makindye Chief Magistrate’s Court on Wednesday to plead to torture charges that arose from the police’s brutal beating of supporters of Opposition leader Kizza Besigye last month.
The Chief Justice likened the Wednesday ugly events to the infamous 2005 attack on the High Court by heavily armed security operatives who besieged the temple of justice.

The armed Black Mamba operatives, as they are commonly known, raided court to re-arrest Dr Besigye, then FDC president, after he had been granted bail in a case where he was accused of treason as a purported leader of the shadowy People’s Redemption Army.

However, the Chief Justice was quick to draw lines between the two incidents; describing the one in 2005 as an “organised security raid” and the Wednesday one as a “mob raid.” He said the raid on Makindye court points to a possible derailment.

“If one side is going to organise mobs to prevent the courts from doing their job, to prevent lawyers from presenting the cases of their clients, then there is something fundamentally wrong and we must address it as a country and as citizens,” Justice Katureebe noted.
“And this applies to all leaders, political leaders regardless of which political party you subscribe to.” 
The Chief Justice wondered whether citizens would rather choose to be governed through mob justice or the rule of law. 
“If we want to be governed by the rule of law, then we must allow the institutions to operate and that is why the Constitution provides for the courts. The Constitution says they (courts) must be independent and are not subject to the control of any authority.” 
Justice Katureebe’s remarks come on the backdrop of Gen Kayihura’s failure to appear before the Makindye Court where he had been summoned and other top police commanders to answer charges of torture contrary to the Prevention and Prohibition of Torture Act, 2012.

The police chief snubbed court and no explanation was given. Instead, police explained that it had cleared the protesters who raided the court premises in early morning with placards reading; Gen Kayihura Talina Musango (Gen Kayihura is innocent).

The lawyers led by Mr Nicholas Opiyo, Mr Abdullah Kiwanuka and Mr Daniel Walyemera attempted to convince court to issue fresh criminal summons against Gen Kayihura but presiding Chief Magistrate Richard Mafabi declined, saying he will pronounce himself on the issue on August 29. The demonstrators, who freely carried out their acts with police officers just looking on, later attempted to lynch some of the lawyers for having instituted the charges against Gen Kayihura.

It took the intervention of the police to evacuate the lawyers who had taken refuge in the chambers of the Chief Magistrate.
When the case resumes on August 29, the DPP is expected to formally apply to take over the prosecution of the matter as mandated by Article 120 of the Constitution.

The case against Kayihura

The lawyers allege that Gen Kayihura and his fellow officers, being superior officers of the Uganda Police Force, in various places in and around Kampala, between 2011 and 2016 but most notably on July 13, and on July 14, are liable for the acts of torture committed against Joseph Kaddu, Andrew Ssebitosi, Rogers Ddiba, and other members of the general public, including boda boda riders and supporters of Dr Besigye. The brutality took place under the command of Mr Andrew Kaggwa, former Kampala Metropoliation South Regional Police commander. They encircled Dr Besigye’s supporters at Busaabala Road junction off Entebbe Road and clobbered them.

Police have no right to beat citizens - Judge

Court of Appeal judge Kenneth Kakuru has criticised the police for brutalising protesters and said the Force’s actions have no legal locus.
Since the February 18 general election, the police have been harshly dispersing Opposition supporters who attempt to organise certain activities which the Force say are illegal. The brutality has since been condemned by human rights groups, the clergy and government officials.

Speaking at the launch of African Media Barometer report in Kampala on Wednesday, Justice Kakuru said it is the duty of the State to observe human rights and that citizens should not be begging for rights guaranteed by the Constitution.
“The police have no right to beat Ugandan citizens. The Constitutional Court struck down a section in the Penal Code that previously empowered courts to order corporal punishment, which was flogging of prisoners convicted of serious crimes such as armed robbery,” Justice Kakuru said.

 

 

 

 

 

Mushega’s political outlook against Besigye in their opposition to the current rule: 

"When you stepped down, I told some leaders at that time that you had stepped down tacticfully in order for you to come back with a bang as an FDC political party flag bearer for the year 2016. So your coming back was not a surprise to me. What surprised me was the spurious reasons you advanced." Amanya Mushega says

By Amanya Mushega

Posted  Monday, August 31  2015  

 
Dear Col. (rtd) Dr Kizza Besigye,

In your interview with one of the local English papers, you insinuated that in my earlier interview with the same paper, l was trying to speak on behalf of president Mugisha Muntu, yet I am not his spokesperson, and that Muntu is competent to speak for himself.

I’m writing this letter to you directly to let you know that l gave my views in my personal capacity. I hold no position in FDC but l have views based on experience in leadership on a fairly long period of reading, observing and in some cases practices.

You stated that in 1999, you approached some of us to leave the Movement and when we failed; you decided to start the work of ‘heavy lifting’ to remove the dictatorship and that you left the Movement for that purpose.

For how long will this ‘heavy lifting be a personal obligation and mission? The fact is that you did not leave the Movement; you just run for the office of the President under the Movement system. There were some members who moved a motion that Mr President be declared a sole candidate in 2000. Some of those movers are now victims of that thinking, some of us openly opposed this move and argued that you were free to stand. We even advised against the efforts to have you arrested and victimised. Your ‘entasiima’.

By the way, to refresh your memory, just 10 years earlier in 1989, you led a team to draft a resolution for a constitutional amendment to extend NRM rule and hence the leadership of President Museveni for an extra five years which was passed.

Then you were the most trusted confidant of the NRM leadership. Only a sole voice, Omulongo Waswa Ziritwawula opposed this move and resigned his seat in Parliament in protest. If you had joined him to fight the nascent ‘dictatorship’, perhaps the course of history of this country would have been different.

We may recall that when the Constitution was being amended to remove term limits, there were many clear voices in and outside Parliament who opposed it and some paid and are still paying a price. Not everyone succumbed to money offers. This was before FDC was formed. And FDC was not founded by a single individual or group. It was a culmination of efforts by several groups and tendencies, to forge a common home for a common effort and purpose.

You may recall my long discussion with you in South Africa in 2004. Many others did visit you. Learn to appreciate that there were other strugglers before you then and there are many others now.

The issues that concern you that I raised in that interview and which l still hold were;
1. You had turned on your word as recorded live on NTV and many other forms of media.

2. That you had not supported your successor Gen. Mugisha Muntu

3. That you had set up parallel structures and centres of power.
I can now add that you don’t easily tolerate different points of view and you don’t genuinely welcome and accommodate those who hold a different point of view. Case in a point, during the Namboole delegates conference in 2010 that elected you for the second term as president, Hon. Wandera Martin was publically announced that he had been appointed unopposed as secretary for labour.

Later on at the first NEC meeting at party headquarters, a meeting you chaired, it was raised that actually there were other people who had been nominated but papers not presented. To cut the long story short, Wandera was dropped and replaced by another person. The real reason, he had supported Muntu. Wandera is alive.

My brother Besigye, you are free to change your mind and you are entitled to run again, but if you do so, say so and why, rather than attacking people who raise that issue as you did in the interview referred to above. You actually state in the same interview that you stood because of the trust voters have in you that is not transferable to another candidate of the same party.

You also pointed that there was a deficit in that trust in your absence and that there was insufficient resolve by leaders in your absence to fight for reforms. Did you really think through this? If you did and it’s true, then your style and content of leadership raises concern. Please learn to respect and appreciate the contribution of others however small or insufficient from your point of view.

If it’s personal to you as if new voters have not come on board and some in the old voters register passed on, then this is in itself failed leadership. When you stepped down, I told some leaders at that time that you had stepped down tacticfully in order to come back with a bang as flag bearer. So your coming back was not a surprise to me, what surprised was the spurious reasons you advanced.

You started a parallel sect dubbed ‘activists’ from the top to the districts level. I will not delve into its activities. My view is that a leader’s role is to reconcile and harmonise different points of view in order to advance a common goal and purpose. Styles of struggle will always be there in any organised society. We should also learn to tolerate different points of view and respond to them without insinuations.

Finally, let me make it clear to all concerned that whoever gets elected and in spite of the attacks and labels put against me by some of your ardent supporters and campaign handlers, we shall support the party and its leadership at all levels.

— Amanya Mushega

 

 

 

 

 

The European Union is changing its colours. It is joining the Opposition about the credibility of a 30-years period of Uganda's National Elections:

European Union Head of Delegation to Uganda Kristian Schmidt addresses journalists after the State-of-the-Nation address last week. Photo by Faiswal Kasirye

Article by Nelson Wesonga 

Posted  Monday, June 8  2015 

IN THE UGANDA DEMOCRATIC PARLIAMENT:

The delegation of the European Union (EU) to Uganda has cast doubt on the credibility of the 2016 general election.

Government, the group said during a closed–door meeting with the Speaker of Parliament, Ms Rebecca Kadaga, has ignored demands for meaningful reform of electoral laws.
Mr Emmanuel Gyezaho, the press and information officer of the delegation, confirmed the meeting took place on Friday at Parliament to discuss the Constitutional (Amendment) and the Non–Governmental Organisation Bills, 2015.
The group said the proposals on elections that the government tabled in Parliament in May “do not address substantive issues”. 
Civil society, Opposition political parties, some religious leaders and opinion leaders have called for the independence of the Electoral Commission (EC) to ensure a credible poll.
In response, the government drafted the omnibus Constitutional Amendment Bill, 2015, which proposes the establishment of a City Land Board, a Salary and Remunerations Board and the renaming of the EC to the Independent Electoral Commission.
“The Constitution (Amendment) Bill did not meet our expectations. The proposals presented are cosmetic and do not address substantial issues. Civil society, clergy and public made a number of very good suggestions, which were ignored…” Mr Kristian Schmidt, head of the delegation, said in a press statement circulated on Friday. “What we believe is the objective criteria in selection of Commissioners. They should be screened by the Judicial Service Commission or another independent body.”
Attorney General Fred Ruhindi yesterday declined to comment on the EU envoys’ stance. “I will have to first get the presentation, study it so that I respond,” Mr Ruhindi said.
However, the Citizens’ Coalition for Electoral Democracy in Uganda coordinator, Mr Crispy Kaheru saluted the EU for taking a stand on the issue of electoral reforms. 
The EU delegation that met Ms Kadaga included Ms Alison Blackburne, the British High Commissioner to Uganda, Mr Donal Crónin, (Ireland), Mr Domenico Fornara (Italy) and Mr Peter Blomeyer (Germany). 
The diplomats had sought audience with Ms Kadaga to talk about electoral reforms and the NGO Bill.
The meeting comes on the heels of the State-of-the-Nation address last Thursday during which President Museveni ignored mention of anything to do with the demand for electoral reforms. “On politics, there is no problem because everything is provided for in the Constitution. So I am not going to talk politics,” President Museveni said on Thursday.
Meanwhile, the National Coalition on Free and Fair elections comprising political, civic leaders and eminent citizens yesterday announced that it will on June 10 state their next move in face of government’s refusal to accept electoral reforms.
The leaders have been at a retreat since June 4 to chart what they termed as “a new political path for the country”.
“Ugandans are aware that the character of deceit and ignoring citizens is consistent with the character of the current regime. The government has dishonoured the citizens compact on free and fair elections and other proposed reforms advanced by other interest groups,” a statement signed by Mr Godber Tumushabe on behalf of the group says.

Nb

Indeed this emphasises the point of not forcing this poor country of Uganda to pay up all its international debts since 1986 when this dodgy regime captured power by force of arms. The EU donates money  to this self-styled NRM regime at its own peril.

 

 

 

 

 

Swiss bank links secret Shs 250 billion to Ugandans:

By Eriasa Mukiibi Sserunjogi

 

Posted  Tuesday, February 10  2015

IN SUMMARY

Suspicion. The bank is accused of providing banking services to corrupt businessmen.

Kampala- Fifty Seven people with links in Uganda are among 100,000 clients of a giant Swiss bank whose account details were recently leaked to French authorities and subsequently released to selected media houses in what has been dubbed the biggest leakage of bank files in history.

Out of the 57 HSBC clients “associated” with Uganda, seven “have a Ugandan passport or nationality.” These 57 clients held a total of $89.3 (about Shs255.6b), with the client associated with Uganda who held the highest amount standing at $8.8m (about Shs25.1b).

To put it in perspective, the $8.8m held in one HSBC account by a client associated with Uganda, who we could not readily establish, is about the amount the Uganda government advanced Eutaw in the botched Katosi road scandal.

Uganda ranked third in the East African Community and 105th in the world among the countries with the largest dollar amounts in the leaked Swiss files, behind Kenya and Tanzania.

Kenya, ranked 58 in the world among the countries with the largest dollar amounts in the leaked Swiss files, had the 742 who were its nationals or connected to it holding some $559.8m (about Shs1.6t) in the bank.

South Africa, the African country with the highest amount stashed away in Swiss HSBC, had its citizens or entities connected to it holding $2b (about Shs5.7t).

HSBC, the second biggest bank in the world headquartered in London, had its Swiss subsidiary helping its wealthy clients escape taxation and hide billions in assets.

The bank also advised clients on how to dodge tax collectors in their countries and to give out substantial amounts of untraceable cash.

Appalled by the wrongdoing in the bank, an employee, Hervé Falciani, who is an IT expert, “hacked into its customer files. He fled to France with police on his trail for breaching Switzerland’s rigid bank secrecy laws,” according to The Guardian, a London-based newspaper.

When Mr Falciani fled Switzerland, he was detained by French authorities. Efforts by the Swiss government to have him extradited to face trial failed after the French authorities realised that the information in his possession could help them identify “thousands of French tax evaders.”

ICIJ has developed an interactive map of the world indicating how much nationals or individuals connected to each country held in the Swiss affiliate of HSBC by 2007.

The interactive is followed by a disclaimer, however: “There are legitimate uses for Swiss bank accounts and trusts. We do not intend suggest or imply that any persons, companies or other entities included in the ICIJ Swiss Leaks interactive application have broken the law or otherwise acted improperly.”

Apart from being of use to French authorities, the files have been relied on for prosecutions in different countries, including the US and Belgium.

The files have now been released to an array of news outlets, including the Guardian, Le Monde of France, BBC Panorama and the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) based in the US. They run a series of stories based on the files on Sunday.

Widespread wrongdoing

One of the charges against the bank is that it provided banking services “to international criminals, corrupt businessmen and other high-risk individuals” around the world, according to the US-based ICIJ.

The Bank, the ICIJ said, also “aggressively marketed schemes likely to enable wealthy clients to avoid European taxes.”

The Swiss Leaks project was “based on a trove of almost 60,000 leaked files that provide details on more than 100,000 HSBC clients and their bank accounts,” a statement on the website of ICIJ said.

The website displays the data relating to the HSBC bank clients on an interactive map of the world.

According to the Guardian, the HSBC “admitted wrongdoing by its Swiss subsidiary.”

“We acknowledge and are accountable for past compliance and control failures,” the bank wrote in a statement to the Guardian, adding that Swiss arm, which it purchased in 1999, had by that time not been fully integrated into HSBC, hence operating at “significantly lower” standards.

emukiibi@ug.nationmedia.com

 

 

 

 

 

The Museveni Presidency of Uganda will not be spared the ghosts of African dictators(African tyranny). 

 What most African Museveni lovers do not want to see happen. Most African diehard would rather die than see such a miserable end of a lifetime.

The political cycle of most African countries has not been different. In the sixties, energy was put to fighting for independence. After attaining it, Africans landed autocratic leaders who ruled as proxies of colonialists. 

In the seventies and early eighties, overthrowing regimes using arms was the order of the day. Subsequently, African nations, especially in the Great Lakes region, produced, as were called by the West, ‘the new breed of African leaders’. And Uganda was one of the ‘blessed’ countries that were liberated by the rebels then, led by Gen Yoweri Museveni.

The cycle has been epitomized by African people, flocking to the streets to get rid of the so-called new breed of African leaders. And as we speak, Burundians are up in arms, fighting their president against raping their constitution to entrench himself in power. Other than Tanzania, none of the African leaders has condemned this act. Can you imagine?

This brings me to the recent proposals on electoral reforms and other authoritarian actions of the NRM regime against its opponents. First, the ‘messiah’, who has consistently justified his option to fight the old regimes as opposed to engaging them politically, has not behaved differently.

Yes, his claims could be true because when he stood for election at both presidential and parliamentary levels, the votes he garnered could barely fill the pocket of his shirt. But as mentioned before, the majority of Ugandans saw a point and joined him in the struggle. What pains, however, are the things that followed.

Most of the cynical political events have been chorused again and again. But for purposes of the young generation, in whose hands rests much of the future, let me re-echo some of them. After capturing power, Museveni promised to rule for only four years.

He then used National Resistance Council (NRC) to extend his stay for another five years. He then duped Ugandans to give him another five years so that he could lay a foundation for the implementation of the new constitution.

Shamelessly, he then came back for another term, claiming that he wanted to professionalize the army. And this came after raping article 105 (2) of the constitution to remove term limits. This particular article was enshrined in our constitution because of our turbulent political history where leaders never wanted to peacefully hand over power.

Just like other African dictators, our president consequently resorted to the enactment of draconian laws such as the Public Order and Management Act, Anti-Terrorism Act, Police Act, etc, to persecute his political opponents.

In the past, some of us who never served his regime were only the casualties. But when the ghost of African dictators continued to capture our president, he could not spare even his close colleagues such as Kizza Besigye, Eriya Kategaya, Mugisha Muntu, Bidandi-Ssali and now Amama Mbabazi. As the saying goes, “nobody is tall enough to predict the future”: The next target, who knows, could be his family member.

However, since this could be a ghost that holds all African leaders in captivity, we must urgently come out to rescue not only Museveni but also Uganda from sliding back to the eighties.

This struggle does not require apportioning blame on those who helped this regime to capture power and those who served it. Neither does it need to treat people like Sejusa and Mbabazi with suspicion. No; even if one of the president’s family members realized the dangers that our country is faced with, we must welcome him/her with an open heart.

I have said this before, and I would like to amplify it. Even if Museveni’s regime granted all the proposed amendments as were submitted, the status quo will remain, and the looming political unrest may not be averted. What we need to do is to either persuade our leaders to relinquish power peacefully, or use all constitutional means, peaceful or otherwise, to save the future.

Of course there are simple talks from the regime beneficiaries to the effect that Ugandans are tired of violence. This could be true; but which country has ever voted on whether or not to go to war?  My advice is that we help our president to defeat the ghosts of African dictators that have held him captive, or the ghosts will take him and our country in the direction where they have taken his counterparts.

The author is spokesperson of People’s Progressive Party.

The Ugandan Electoral Commission gives political parties Shs10 billion to agree to participate in the coming National General Election of 2016.

By Herbert Zziwa & Stephen Kafeero

Posted  Tuesday, April 21  2015

IN SUMMARY

She said party structures will sit and decide how the money will be used. The ruling party has 259 MPs in the 386-member House, leaving the Opposition with 64. Independents account for 43, while ex-officios (members without voting rights) and army representatives having 10 each.

Kampala-UGANDA:

Six years after Parliament passed the law on political party financing, the Electoral Commission (EC) yesterday announced that it has released Shs10 billion to facilitate the organisations’ activities ahead of the 2016 polls.

In line with the amended Political Parties and Organisations Act, 2005, EC chairman Badru Kiggundu told journalists that only six political parties are eligible to receive a share of this money.

“The formula of distribution is prescribed in the law; it is on the basis of strength in Parliament. So if you have 20 members, we shall get the members divide by the total number of members in Parliament and then multiplied by Shs10 billion,” he noted.

NRM party treasurer Rose Namayanja Nsereko acknowledged that her party has received its share.

“We have already received Shs7.9 billion and this is depending on our representation in Parliament. It looks like a lion’s share but this is the law that was passed by the entire House,” Ms Namayanja said yesterday.

She said party structures will sit and decide how the money will be used. The ruling party has 259 MPs in the 386-member House, leaving the Opposition with 64. Independents account for 43, while ex-officios (members without voting rights) and army representatives having 10 each.

The Forum for Democratic Change has 37 MPs; Democratic Party 15; Uganda Peoples Congress 10; Justice Forum (Jeema) and Conservative Party with one MP each will share the remaining Shs2.1b.

Section 14A of the amended Political Parties and Organisations Act of 2005 mandates government to fund political parties.

Under this section, registered political parties and organisations shall be funded by government. The architects of the law insisted on numerical strength determining how the money is distributed to guard against briefcase parties with no headquarters or members taking advantage of the facility.

Mr Kiggundu said political parties which have already availed the necessary information, including bank account numbers to the Commission have received the money.

“We wrote to them; those who responded have received the money. Others are still having internal wrangles but we shall wait until the wrangles are settled to release the money, and each party will be required to provide accountability after the electoral exercise,” he said.

Last evening, UPC vice president Joseph Bbosa said he “will need to cross check with the party administration but I am not aware of any funding from government”.

Ms Alice Alaso, the FDC secretary general, said the EC had written to the party informing them that the ministry of Finance was due to release the money.

“I think they will send us the money, though by this evening (yesterday), we had not received it. This time the commission should be strict on accountability since we, as FDC, have been submitting our audited accounts yet the NRM, which received the largest amount, does not.”

Conservative Party president, John Ken Lukyamuzi, who is the only CP legislator, said while they have not received any funding from government, time is now for government to fund political parties.

Masaka Democratic Party delegates threaten to boycott the democratic elections within their political party constituency:

 

Posted by Malik Fahad Jjingo

Posted  Thursday, June 25   2015 

 

MASAKA,BUGANDA STATE, UGANDA: 

Democratic Party delegates in Masaka District have threatened to boycott the party national delegate’s conference slated for July 23, accusing the leadership of failure to handle petitions in the recently concluded grassroots party elections.
The delegates said they have on several occasions petitioned the national party leadership to intervene and organise fresh elections for the district, but the leaders have not addressed their concerns.

“We have on several occasions raised our issues and they(National Executive Committee) have not listened to us. We have now prepared a written petition to them and if they don’t address our concerns, we shall instead boycott the delegates conference,” Ms Florence Namayanja, the MP Bukoto East Constituency, said.

The resolution to petition the party top leadership was reached on Sunday during a meeting convened in Mukungwe Sub-county in Masaka District.

The meeting was chaired by Bukoto East Constituency DP chairperson Dick Lukyamuzi. They also unanimously agreed to organixe fresh elections for the district claiming that Masaka District DP leadership led by Mr Denis Mukasa Mbidde was illegally elected.

Last month, Masaka DP leaders defied a directive by the secretary general, Mr Mathias Nsubuga that elected Mr Mbidde as party chairperson.

Some party members led by Ms Namayanja boycotted the elections, saying they were irregularly conducted. Ms Namayanja said the elections marred by irregularities, adding that only delegates from seven out of the nine sub-counties took part in the polls .

However, Masaka DP organising secretary Innocent Katerega said the new district executive was legally elected and that they were supervised by DP national vice chairperson Evelyn Walimbwa.

He said Ms Namayanja and her faction stubbornly boycotted the elections and this could not stop the polling exercise.

editorial@ug.nationmedia.com

Nb

It is unfortunate that this is a party of African Democracy that seems not to have any democracy in its organization!

 

 

 

 

The Uganda Peoples Congress political party names a team to probe its Election standoff within its party:

Outgoing UPC president Olara Otunnu

 

 

By Shabibah Nakirigya

Posted  Friday, June 26   2015

 

Kampala.UGANDA:

The Uganda People’s Congress Party (UPC) has set up a commission of inquiry to defuse a crisis simmering in the party.

The feud came to light on May 30 when a faction allied to presumptive new UPC leader Jimmy Akena forcibly entered the party headquarters at Uganda House in Kampala and reportedly forced the party electoral commission to declare Mr Akena the winner of the district conference polls.

The team headed by Prof Patrick Rubaihayo, a senior party member, will hold talks with two rival factions threatening to split the party into two.

One faction is led by outgoing party president Olara Otunnu and the other by Mr Akena after last month’s elections.

Addressing journalists from the ninth floor of Uganda House where the commission of inquiry will operate from, Mr Otunnu said the developments in the party were “alarming.” 
“The task (of the commission) is to conduct independent findings on what happened, who did what and what are the constitutional implications of some of these developments,” he said yesterday.

Mr Otunnu, who was appearing in the building for the first time since the election standoff, added that the committee is charged with looking into allegations of massive vote buying and bribery and extensive substitution of voters in connection with the May 30 nomination exercise.

The committee is expected to deliver its findings by July 10, the date earlier slated for the delegates’ conference.

Committee members are Prof Patrick Rubaihayo, Prof Charles Kagenda Atwooki, Prof W.W Anokbonggo, Dr James Rwanyarare and Mr Peter Walubiri.

 

snakirigya@ug.nationmedia.com

 

 

 

 

 

The African Angola regime rules its people worse than the previous Spanish and Portuguese Regimes:


Publish Date: Aug 16, 2015

 

The Angolan journalist and human rights activist Rafael Marques de Morais has been interviewed by Portuguese author and Oxford University associate professor Ricardo Soares de Oliveira (R).

 

This interview was on August 14, 2015 in Johannesburg, South Africa.

 


JOHANNESBURG - From beating women to unleashing dogs on protesters, Angola's government runs the oil-rich nation with an apartheid-style iron fist, says maverick activist Rafael Marques de Morais.

"Some of the methods the Angolan regime uses are reminiscent of what the apartheid regime used here in South Africa against the majority of the people," Marques told AFP in an interview in Johannesburg.

"It's reminiscent of the old tactics the fascist Portuguese colonial regime used against the former colonial subjects," added the outspoken 43-year-old, who was a guest speaker at the South African launch of a new book on Angola.

Marques, Angola's most prominent human rights activist and journalist, was convicted earlier this year of defaming military generals in a book about violence in the country's diamond mining industry.

International rights groups say activists and journalists are increasingly being targeted by the regime of President Jose Eduardo dos Santos, who has been in power since 1979.

Fifty groups including Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International wrote to the president in May decrying the charges against Marques, who was handed a six-month suspended jail term.

"This case reflects a broader deterioration in the environment for freedom of expression in Angola, including the increasing use of criminal defamation lawsuits against journalists and routine police abuse" of protesters, they wrote.

Last week, Marques said police violently suppressed a protest demanding the release of 15 opposition activists who were arrested in June and charged with planning to attack and oust Dos Santos.

The protesters, numbering around 50, were "mostly mothers and relatives of these political prisoners," said Marques, who was briefly detained at the event and had his camera confiscated by police.

"As these women were being beaten by the police, some fell, and the police would unleash the dogs on them."

The Oxford-educated activist said Dos Santos' regime had reached "a new low" in trying to suppress freedom of speech.

"Even within the regime, beating up mothers was inconceivable," he said, adding: "The ruling elite hates its own people."

Angola at 'crossroads

After emerging from a brutal 27-year civil war in 2002, Angola's huge oil supplies have fuelled a staggering ten-fold growth in the economy in the past decade.

But the recent slump in global oil prices has spelt disaster for the country, which faces elections in two years.

"In 2017, if the oil prices remain down, this regime will face the greatest challenge of its life in power, because the discontent will only grow," Marques said.

"And as the regime also seeks to repress more to maintain its grip on power, that, in the end, will backfire," he predicted.

Angola's huge oil revenues have failed to trickle down to most of its 24.3 million citizens -- half of whom live on less than $2 a day -- while turning a select few in the political elite into billionaires.

And Marques believes that the government's increasingly repressive approach is a response to Angola's changing economic fortunes.

"We are now at a crossroads whereby there is a serious economic crisis," he said.

"Now the government is trying to mitigate the economic crisis by increasing repression, because for many years what worked in Angola was a policy of carrot-and-stick ... but nowadays what government has been left with is the stick. So we are seeing an increase in political violence."

 

 

 

 

 


Macon Phillips

MACON PHILLIPS, the coordinator of the US State Department's Bureau of International Information Programs was recently in Uganda meeting the most influential social media users (netizens). Frank Kisakye interviewed Phillips as he concluded his African fact-finding tour.

Which countries have you been to on your African tour?

In the past two weeks, I have been to Senegal, Ghana and Uganda meeting with civil society organisations and in particular young leaders as part of President Obama’s Young African Leaders Initiative [YALI].

We have also been working with our embassies in those countries on assessing their needs in terms of how they engage people, and trying to modernise their technology [while] trying to identify areas where our team back in Washington DC can help them.

And also in Uganda, I had the opportunity to speak with members of the government, members of the civil society, and individual citizens who shared with me, but more importantly with each other, their concerns and ideas about Internet freedom.

What are some of your key findings?

The best part of being a diplomat is learning the puzzle piece that is each country in the world and that each one is unique and that each media environment is unique, that its history and culture is unique, each economy is unique. But there are some universally-shared values and interests with the United States.

One of those is a belief that young leaders need to be supported, need to be more entrepreneurial, need to take initiative in connecting with one another and that has been a consistent thread through my trip. Identifying those people in determining what support they need.

Another one is the freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and expression - in this case online but really in any case and trying to determine the best way the United States can support that freedom.

What you mention there was your mission; what were the findings?

In Senegal, I was able to meet with organisations that are putting together the regional leadership centre and that is beginning [in] the next few weeks…We also have another regional leadership center that is part of the YALI in Accra; I visited there and that has already 100 young leaders that have gone through it.

And what I found there was that there is a huge appetite for support and training, not just on how to be a more practical leader but on policy issues like climate change, women’s empowerment and trade, and we’re doing everything we can to make sure that these young leaders are informed.

That feedback was very useful. I also met with the Mandela Washington Fellow alumni from last year’s program in Accra who gave me very specific feedback about how US can help fellows when they return to their home countries to get to work on their projects. So, that was very useful too.

Finally, we had a tech camp outside of Accra that focused on elections and civil society engagement where we brought 60 young leaders to a single site with tech trainers to discuss innovations the NGOs can play in promoting peaceful and fair elections because as you probably know, there is a number of elections coming across the region.

It was great to bring them together. One takeaway from all these discussions is that most of the time, the United States’ best contribution is simply connecting these young leaders to one another; so, our convening power is ability to bring people together is something we intend to continue to use. Did that answer your question? What were you hoping I would find?

Well, I expected to hear from you what the young leaders, youths feel about internet freedom, the environment they are operating in and what they expect from development partners. Also talk about the regulation of social media vis a vis the control, putting into perspective what happened to Uganda during the election period.

In my conversations with young leaders and in general, there is great concern about efforts that governments take to regulate and censor and block social media and the internet. And those are efforts that are not found just in Uganda, these efforts are happening around the world.

The United States shares that concern. And one finding from talking to these young people about all this is that they understand the solution is both government’s responsibility but also their own.

And I mean it this way, the government can block or unblock social media but what content is actually on that social media is a responsibility of not just the government but civil society.

So, to make social media viable, young leaders need to take initiative and those are some of the most exciting projects that we had with people who were doing voter education and campaigns, who were doing women’s health campaigns campaigns, those who were doing also some initiatives to educate people and to add content to the information space so that it becomes more valuable, and not just a place of disagreement and contest.

One of the examples of that we have helped is the YALI learners platform where people can go watch courses that are coming, check that: out it is quite interesting, but it’s a place where we are adding small topics about climate change, leadership lessons and people watch and talk about it in their communities.

In terms of regulating the internet, as I said earlier, the United States is deeply concerned about the recent events here in Uganda because we [value] the Ugandans’ right to free speech and assembly just like we value our own and everyone’s around the world.

When you’re thinking about internet content and regulation, I think it is important to understand where the United States approaches this because it is in our constitution. It explicitly says that we shall make no law concerning with freedom of speech.

So, what I mean is we don’t even accept the question of what appropriate way is to regulate content on the Internet. We say that is a category that shouldn’t be regulated. Now the Internet will reflect offline realities. There are laws to protect copyright, to fight terrorism, to do all sorts of things and those can still be applied online but we are talking about the medium itself.

This is something that shouldn’t be feared and shouldn’t be restricted; it should be embraced and grown not just in its size but in its depth and quality. That is something the government has a responsibility to do both in terms of its own participation and genuine engagement with the public as well as protection of independent media and independent civil society actors; because that is what made American democracy, I guess, doable and vibrant although [it] crept into violence sometimes.


Macon Phillips addressing Ugandan citizens

You earlier hinted on the different ways governments can involve citizens in building democracy based on social media, can you elaborate?

When I worked at the White House for President Obama for four years, managing the office of digital strategy, we thought about our responsibility in three main areas.

One was making sure that President Obama’s policies and administration were made available to people where they were getting that information, that weren’t still relying on traditional channels like television, newspapers even though those are still important; but we were also looking for new audiences, particularly younger audiences that sometimes don’t even watch television and are just online.

The second area was really working on content development to shift the burden of understanding public policy from the average citizen back to government. The government should be able to clearly communicate what it’s doing on behalf of the taxpayer or citizens. We spent a lot of time on videos, graphics and content.

The final piece was finding opportunities worthy for citizens to participate in their government and that had a wide range of things from identifying people to interview the president to interview other policymakers and ask questions that they had about certain policies, represent communities that were often not heard inside the White House as well as large-scale petitions platforms with other people where anyone could create a petition and if it gets a certain number of signatures, the White House will respond. That’s had 17 million users.

So, there is a wide span but the underlying theme is that the Obama administration takes public engagements seriously because of the president’s personal history as a community organiser and our recognition that in the 21st century you can’t just ignore conversations, they are opportunities for engagement; so, we seek them out.

Any particular government policies that you can pinpoint to that were effected due to social media conversations?

One that you might find interesting, it is not like a major policy issue…in the United States you don’t get unlocked phones. I see you guys running around popping Sim-cards in and out all the time; Americans don’t understand what it is because the telephone companies lock us in into our phones.

If I have an AT&T phone, I can’t use another Sim-card on it and that is an unfair corporate practice and so someone started a petition, petitioning the president to instruct the National Telecommunications Information Agency to seek a change in that policy. I bring up this example because it wasn’t a matter of war and peace, it wasn’t, you know, a matter of spending trillions of dollars on education, what it was was an issue that wasn’t even on the radar of the administration.

It wasn’t something we were talking about but because we did public engagement, because we offered these powers, citizens were able to organise, bring an issue to us, we reviewed it and it made sense.

Then congress took it up, addressed everybody, passed it and the president signed it into law. Now I can unlock my phone. So, public engagement doesn’t need to simply be on the huge existential issues of the day. It allows governments to be more responsive to requests, big and small, and ultimately do a better job for the people.

You said you were a social media activist before joining government; what would you advise the Uganda government given the deliberations and interactions that you have had on your tour?

That is a great question. I don’t want my advice to be specific to Uganda; frankly I  am still learning and speaking from my experience, this would be the advice I give to any government.

Avoid the dynamic of government and opposition, try to engage people on specific issue questions. Avoid zero-sum conversations of I am doing this, am not doing this. Try to use more words like how and why in terms of your communication.

In addition, be proactive, pro-actively inform the public of certain public policy issues that you are debating and create an opportunity for them to respond before the decision is made rather than just try to explain decisions - which you should do but people always want to be asked before something happens.

I think the final piece is, at a more pragmatic practical level, try to promote as managers in government and as people who are working with new technologies in government try to promote the free-flow of ideas and people between the private sector and government. Host fora to bring people into government buildings, have internships with people who have technical skills that can come in and contribute.

People wanna serve. Ugandans want to help the government just like Americans want to help their government. So, create opportunities for the private sector and non-private sector to contribute to government because [they] will also walk away with a better understanding about how government works. We are really good at building walls between government and the public and no democracy really benefits from that.

fkisakye@observer.ug